Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

S.Bavanisankar vs State Represented By on 8 January, 2020

Author: Abdul Quddhose

Bench: Abdul Quddhose

                                                                           W.P.No.8612 of 2014

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED: 08.01.2020

                                                   CORAM
                               THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
                                              W.P.No.8612 of 2014


                 S.Bavanisankar                                            ...    Petitioner

                                                        Vs.

                 State represented by:
                 The Tahsildar,
                 Office of the Poonamallee Tahsildar,
                 Poonamallee,
                 Tiruvallur District – 600 056.                            ...   Respondent


                 PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                 to issue a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to resurvey the land
                 covered by the Patta in No.992 in Survey No.413/1C1 A7, measuring 00.7.5
                 Ares, situated at Paruthipattu Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur
                 District.


                             For Petitioner              : No appearance

                             For Respondent              : Mr.R.S.Selvam,
                                                           Government Advocate




                                                                       ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

http://www.judis.nic.in
                 1/2
                                                                              W.P.No.8612 of 2014

                                                                                               nl

                                               ORDER

The matter is listed under the caption “for withdrawal” today. There is no representation on the side of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion i.e., on 06.01.2020, there was no representation on the side of the petitioner. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.


                                                                                    08.01.2020

                 nl

                 Index      : Yes / No
                 Internet   : Yes / No

Speaking/Non-speaking orders To The Tahsildar, Office of the Poonamallee Tahsildar, Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District – 600 056.

W.P.No.8612 of 2014 http://www.judis.nic.in 2/2