Karnataka High Court
Parle Workers Union vs Parle Products Pvt Ltd on 12 June, 2013
Author: Mohan .M.Shantanagoudar
Bench: N Kumar, Mohan .M.Shantanagoudar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
Dated this the 7th day of June, 2013
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR
Review Petition No. 238 of 2003
In
WP Nos.20780, 20782, 20783, 20784,
20785, 20786, 20788 & 20789 of 1997
BETWEEN:
1. Y. R. Shenoy
S/o late Y.N. Shenoy
Aged about 62 years
R/at No.K1216, 14th Cross
19 'B' Main 1st Block
Rajajinagar
Bangalore - 560 010
2. M. Narasimha Pai
S/o M. Munjunatha Pai
Aged about 63 years
R/at No.B-308
K.T. Apartments-44
8th Main, 1st cross, 3rd Block East
Jayanagar
Bangalore - 560 011
2
3. H. Sanjeeva Shenoy
S/o H. Ananthaiah Shenoy
Aged about 62 years
R/at H.S.S. Building
S.N. Nagar
Bangalore - 577 401
4. V.S. Surendra Ramashesh
S/o D.S. Ramashesh
Aged about 63 years
R/at Padmashree 990/M
11th Cross, 25th Main
Kallappa Layout Srinagar
Bangalore - 560 050
5. B.P. Prabhu
S/o B. Venkataramana Prabhu
Aged about 63 yars
R/at 42 Syndicated Bank Colony
Magadi Main Road
Bangalore - 560 079
6. M. Gopalakrishna Bhat
S/o Anantharaya Bhat
Aged about 62 years
"Radhakrishna" 5-2-68/D
Kolambe Udupi - 576 101
Dakshina Kannada District
7. T. Ramachandra Kalkur
S/o T. Sridhar Kalkur
Aged about 62 years
No.28, Devikrupa
Cauvery Bai Layout
Appurao Road 6th Main
Chamarajpet
Bangalore - 560 018
3
8. B. Venkat Rao
S/o late Lakshminarayana Kamath
Aged about 63 years
B8 Anand Apartments
6th Cross, Gandhinagar
Mangalore - 575 003 ...Petitioners
(By Sri Harikrishna S. Holla, Advocate)
AND:
1. Syndicate Bank
Having Head Office at
Manipal Udupi Taluk
Dakshina Kannada District
Reptd. By its Chairman &
Mangalore Director
2. Indian Banks Association
Statium House 6th Floor
Block 3 Veer Nariman Road
Mumbai - 400 020
Represented by its Secretary ...Respondents
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, praying for review of the order dated 20-12-2002 passed in WP No. WP Nos.20780-20789 of 1997, WP Nos.13575-13592 of 1997, WP No.31085 of 1996, WP No.21610 of 1997 & 35137 of 1997 on the file of this Hon'ble Court.
This Review Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following:
4O R D E R In view of the fact that the judgment of this Court has been upheld in appeal, I do not see any justification to review the order, as any review is to be done, it is to be done by the appellate Court, as this order has merged with the appellate order. RP dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE ksp/-