Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

The Management vs K.Senthil Raja on 1 November, 2018

Author: S.Vimala

Bench: S.Vimala

                                                                1

                                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                      DATED : 01.11.2018

                                                              CORAM:

                                               THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA

                                                      W.P.No.3749 of 2016
                                                   and W.M.P.No.3122 of 2016

                      The Management,
                      Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation
                            (Salem) Ltd.,
                      12, Ramakrishna Road,
                      Salem – 636 007.
                      Rep. by General Manager.                                         ... Petitioner

                                                               Vs.

                      1. K.Senthil Raja

                      2. The Presiding Officer,
                         Labour Court,
                         Salem.                                                        ... Respondents

                              Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for

                      the issuance of a writ of certiorari, to call for the records of the order passed by

                      the 2nd respondent in C.P.No.254/2013 dated 13.01.2015 and to quash the

                      same.

                              For Petitioner              :      M/s.Rajeni RAmadoss

                              For Respondents             :      M/s.M.Palani for R1
                                                                 Court - R2




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                              2



                                                          ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that in view of the direction given by this Court by an order dated 12.09.2018 made in W.P.No.5725 of 2014 on 12.09.2018, the prayer sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

01.11.2018 ogy http://www.judis.nic.in 3 DR.S.VIMALA, J.

ogy W.P.No.3749 of 2016 01.11.2018 http://www.judis.nic.in