Karnataka High Court
M S Srinivas S/O Late M S Subbanna vs G S Seshachala Alias Srinivas on 5 November, 2008
Author: B.V.Nagarathna
Bench: B.V.Nagarathna
'@$g%awAm&%A@@M
."wmwwwmmw«mmmmmwwwmwwmmmwwwmwrMWWMM%M£WWW%UUW§UW%MmW%%flfifififlfiaflgyfiffififimmmfiflgfififififlwgf
...1..
:3»; Efifil-I 03139'? G? Kamxmm AT M
mww THIS THE sm DAY OF H0vEnmE:é:2ax§3%% L
l3EPT}RE
THE HCMPBLE h&RS.JU8TI{3E_B.§f;._fiAGA?§AffH_Vf[A'_i'; A
g.g.1z.g.ng.392 w¢_;;;_r 1
'snmrunmnnn. f'a T .V*.."=
a 3 Skzxzvnz V»w-j- - ; ;A
EEG LATE finsfsufia ;#A'»"<hu_W
Efififi ABQGE §$;¥EARS , {V ,
Rf; R@:3§:2g"i5TH{;Rbg3,._~
HQEE LA¥Qfir; 3.', a' E
%AL;AH£fiA§Lif' *g'
3Aw§aLoas+5£,'- a *
. ' . .. pm:-norm
{By 3:31: PR?-.531}, £°&civ., )
affiflg 5f%14 Xx a-M., .....
wL=v§*5"5E$E3c3ALA ALIAS SRIEIVASA
'. fi:NmU;._-j'
*x§J$R'¥,'
K§a=§fl;é2, 15? Marx
, wmafizaz EK?EH5IGN
x afiyégzaag 553 92:
"= amsponnuaw
'i;m fisy 55:: SREKRHTH $4M & K suaannxa BAEUE
Instant:
€315 KEEP I5 FILEQ Ufa 46 {1} GE KR AS?
k AGfiIfi§? THE QREER. BATE$:l.4.2QQ6 PASSED IN
- 2 -
Em£..1<:'=;'3.z1:.3f2€3fir3 :32»: was 3122 GE z*£~rs~, xx:
mnL.5,~2=L2=u:L C.?«2USE5 swag, iii'-'aI*$G£3.3LsCi*RE; ".'i."**.~.:"'+:"*,f':'.4'§1"+-..,'8:.r
£'%ESI\fi¥3SI?~3'?'..~":'r Tm mxcwzmz mrxrmza F:mI:{v__I_E';'~5$_ :2":
52:: $3,; 3. £33 02' HR ACT. ..
Wis HRBP CQIvIIN(:}""'a:)NA §~i:R?rHEfz%%%
gamma, mxs DAY, T1-I=§ €JQURTA..MAD:jE__"*'§?§{E *
mLmwwG:-- J % =
suaizéus '
"';"h§s Revisiari' by the landlord
cha.i1amgir;g«-::A:Vthe passed in
of XII Addl. Small
The peztitionm'
here§1.VV_i-S A iévho had filed petitism under
Maggy; (Jay at' Kalmataka Rent Act, 1999
gaff tha respzzrndent tenant. The sad"
; éismisacd by the tnal' Court,
fig: }}£§%Liiif3€§,:¢1;4'.l$.I1d1Gfd has. preferred this revm' ion.
_.§¢fifi§fi_
aeWMf,«~.¢:wmm ma" wmmmammwfi MEWW azwwfiy OF %fiKNfiLW£Kfia HEQH mmm' 53$ §€'§fiWN%?"fi%§«% §"§%fi3%M flflwm" fl? Kfisfiwfififlfifi Wig"
VT The petitiaoner hcmm' had filed the eviction
V w :r'"\'n w w-'va
gm-tit§.::s§'3; M: the gmunci that his famiiy cesnsista cf
;''4:.
-§€§¢'Q»C\$'ii1 H
«WW-wmu war :mMmWw.&W.xf\a% mmvw ggwgma W?' mmwméfmm Hififi Cfiflfi? W? Efififiwflfififififi §°%§€Z%%*§ fi€.'EE.¥R"¥' Q? §€fi«§%"i§'éé%f"E"&&§.a%% HE€W-E €f.'€3}U%2°¥" 0? mwmmm HWGW I
._ 4 _
whveduie pramisas for the purposse of damq1ifii9jz_V_and
recomstzuatian and that the
human maés in the instant
same aa wag made amt "
patzfititm filed by
I-E,R.,CJ'%"e,,§45\4f 19%_ana "ng e: in
cireumtanee, the :' _fr;>r eviction alas
euah: to b:*»'5 *
'3tég¢;'it'. 'i' 3"'V*rJe"§lmrant ta state that the
pcfifiaéfiar' had earlier prcfiermd
3,.a.::m%,;54;k96%a;iaL% the mg of the XVI mm. Small
{§au%:%§e:3:VA'A~a§udge, figalare and the same was
, the order dated:8.7.98, againat which,
t§§,e. "'--V ;&§'i%i«m:3;er herein had preferred HRRP
'I'%§.?L §r'3'§;"9'8 bafore thia Court and the said reviaion
yeafiaa aim: dismissed by tag erdcr dat¢d:21.3.£)3
msczvim §ihe:rty be the gefiticrrner herain ta file a.
fimh petitian surfing mrintinn by urging all such
.éL.=
-mawm MUU%i§ W1?" W#7%¥K§VdiM.$!§s'§aE€.#?é WEWW WV' %.z3%fi%{Wa%§;$$€.%4W MEWW mumm WW Rflkfimfliflflfifl MEWW MQMWE M? mmmmmmmm MEWW %&%..M£,§§%E £3? 5°*'-§.=€3tx}%€N»s5?£E&#i»%. ?'M%g.W'§ €
-- 5 ---
legal gaaunda asvaifiable to him and if such pgtijriqn is
filed, éhe Sam: maym csnsidered
e-mas' wauéd be paaaed on itsnswn
esircumstancfi», the §et:'tio13.e;f;hé5i*eii1
cvietiam peiitian and ¥::~ased 'pa *§ha_
the ;:mrt:'a$.} cm: ,€:¢%;£r:kkA:a;:sca.'%:1;¢j following
paixlts far ita 9» '
5:. §;1:>ves that he
1 """ gchadule premises
"f'm"' and occupation far
A 2 rccanstructia :1?
m;ati@gr'pem1tioner is enfitled ta an
* cf evictian. under Setxtion 27(2) ( r)
{ea af tha Kaznataka Rent Act 1999?
What crdar?
fifisr rewarding art' evidence an both sides,
'aé1am§.r1, the petiticanew maminad himself as PW-1
éfa
RN;§£§'.é%%fl %"%%&§*~% cmm" w? mwfifimm Mifivfl
"WW §j-e.~WifwM W' wmwmmmz a-mm wmmm mg mmfigmm §»§%%%*§ azmm Q?
-- 6 -
and gs': axamimsd his landlerd as PW-2 Gf
his tmzamta in zwpect emf two shops
prwemiaw in the schedule ;p_s_r;§r;1_ise$a
and an the baais sf Exs-Pvi:.At4:;
evidegacs Qf respondcnibV5;:fg'-»..13W¥'1 "fa
axxavszaxw. pains. az9a.1«k%%&kkki%'%:2 ti1é"ne§.§fim and
éimigsafi the aggrieved by
thc said petiticmer has
§1'Ef€:I"I'€:{i1: V
" hciumdcv Praead, learned
the mtififincr and Sri. szikanth & Sri K.
V. '- A mammal for the rwpandent.
submittad on behalf at' thc petitiener
t§.1a;'z. §;e triai Quart was not right in dismissing the
'V'..AV"§'§ictis3n petifian an the gmund that the paetitioner
had mist made mat the requiraxnaut uuda Saetien 27
[SE Er} rfw eiause {cl Gf the Act. He aubmits that
&~
...7..
suficien': fividence waa pmducsed by way
and $5, %aing the estimate and
the pmmse sf demalitinn, and
aim E333-P9 to PM rm:
firmarzéai Sagacity £PW--2',
geattitéanery, F9aFs--2 ta make
arm :3. cage' of tht:
ached*a1§eH dour: errtmcoualy
fiisméssisg an the grnund tlmt
thei% the need for
éamafiiéicrrx vrécsfigwxigtian and at; aewunt of
_.*:§;; 11$ "«5:§-Ltggat. ware initiated against the
i€;m.a:§<:'E's GT two ether shop prsmises which
demeéished as: per the plan
-- 3_§§'.."-:,st::'£1¥::1*zé::3;.:_, i~I~I¢ thcrcfare rcqu-miss tbis Court. to r¢-
the esééence can record and allsaw the
petitisn filed by the pefificnfl by allewing
n féhis raviaian petitican, if
mmm mwww ma" mmmmmwzamwa W%W&""§ mwwm my mmvawgmmma M-mm mmmm KM" W%%€WM§m§KM §'l!M':a7vM Lgmmfl 0? mmmmm mam MMJM" {M §{,;%.&N£%g32&%% MWM 4
X-_,.
nub ....
that aha petitiangr has not been hia
ifitersfiazm ta week the pnossessien
premiaam required far the puzrpizstf: <;fV
mmamsfiucfian, inasmugh jivhés' .
any gerzcrceadim car t1ie
tmanzzs cf the . required
1151' {Em yurpaaee af tha conduct
maf mg mgficate his true:
iatergtgrcgm ef the premises.
Unégr he submits that the trial
Gasurt wan' 'j=.;@sU7fié:1 the petition far
.::vjatiav_:T:.5l, dens nat call far any
Court.
mtg $1' the rim} submissions, the
§§z§s;%..*1itni:"~-._fth1a§%. aréaaeé far my emenaideration are as
/§(
ms" mwwm WE" mmmmflmrfam WEWW mwwam am" ax-.nmmmm.e:wa~m mm"? mmmm mm" ammvmmmam mzaim ammm Q!' MRNMYRM MW?-'§ azmzm fifi wmmmmm mm"
_,/4.
--- 10 --
ass. Whethar the evicizimi petiticrn filed
petitiorwr herein is hit by me§m¢ip1fa:
937 resjudicata. ther:'ifé'm""V: naifl '* 'V
ma.i.:1ta_m' able £11
iiarnataka R¢n'fi.g§;::: ::, 1'9*3:9_f?V
fa. If we ~:szo..1 is" in the
rmgesfivc, __ 'iihé fiatitianer is
__ 15:: 'j ifiéirision petition.
:2'. Ag. mg __re3:evant to mac: the
giaading H filed by the petitionar
2n'I"--.§::3§_}____fl1} and {5} of me Karnatalm
A§F€v:+,fnt:.V'€$a:J;1*§.;*{;»1:v'«;:¢§::*t, 1951 as it thaw azdsted, with
/,,,__'V. 1f'€g&.§"":.?3.!i§r t}§::.v'V'r1§rii:§irement 9f the schedule prremisea.
amtzfigfiicd petititm in H.R.C.iHo.164/96 is
Ex-R1 and para. 6 & 8 are ezrtracwd
1 fl
sm.ar~a>.uIv¢:.lWsa£~"°aIK1r*'%iiwé**'€a w"IzwwA'w.W_fJI%§ we" mmmmmfiflfiwk WEKSEM zzzmwm €23?' %fi%N&T&Ké% HEQM €®§..5fi'§" E23?' ¥%§{'§?M €Z'fl?§.fi%?' @F %ffifi"€WflTfiKfi Wififi
//"'
V1£cr'"9&3flJQ/"WI
Wm osmwww fiwjfwwn war" mmmmmaflm WWW L?%fl£m' W?' §€A%N&Ya%E§".%. §*$§€§% fiififiiifii"? $3?' @§&%N&?&Kfi flffiw KQUQT Q? Kfiflwfiffiaififla Mf$i*§
-12..
ymmiam. 'Phase grown up children, si;.e t£;r._V
and sisters scan have :19 priv:g;¢f;r,'V"':é£.
imiegendent roams and with
wlm ia ts be marticd than them w=:;u1d=.b=6 ' I K
mamity of a.mcammod;a.ti.c:1'z " 4:'_>'£ '
gxxrivacy ta thn: msmbcrs Q5f'£}1'e.f f&1.'£l,i.'£j;€v.§§f
this petitioneezt."
E3332 3.3 the avidgrztze
ia H.E.C.EaIas.164/96 afviaenm of
PW-2 hemm ix; ms is the
cvidame gf Ex-«R5 is the
evidamayrif in the said
avictixzzsn certificcl capy of the
csrdez" fl_a:Ii;.¢é:3"."7._.:93.gaki;-3&3' in H.gR.C.Na~.1€:4/96. The
{.fé':'*j in the aaarlier eviction
£.:nc:w=a:~
V
A' 'iéafrlafi-:13 needs the petitiazm schedule
V' prrecmises far his awn use and
4%'/.«.
cuacuyatian?
msww Mwwmfi war mmmmmmmm smmm: %ww%e,;sM mew" Exmsgwwmsmmfi WEWM mwwm U?' Wmmmmsm mam a;m,,am' my Mmwmmm Mmm mama! {M MARMAEAEM Mfififlfii
-13.. ,
b. %thart11e pefifioner
the petitian gchedule ; :..j::
masonabky and bc_m.a.fi{;le K V' V
him for the 1mm'
dmaliahmg" ii sac»,
:9 be mafia 4_ fa1§V*'ihie:'%.Z'I';'1;ir;:;osc: §:§'i' e':?§ct1'ng
3. new bu1ldmg'VV_V_ Eh: petiticm
""" or pmsible "£0
« L % Ase: partial evieticm?
Vv paflw pmvm that he
' ice» greatew harziship if the
7 not allawed?
fitficf?
' £'s'AAn«aticed, in E:::-R5 an ecnsidaratimiz at' the
mfi écaztumanmnr eviéenee in ihfi said case, the
tzial {mutt answered psaixat Natal tan 4 in the ngative
fl/X'r'
- 14 --- ,
and afismiased the said evicfixzrn pefltion urgtisgr 21
{1} (11% & ii} fifths Act.
fiismfisaal, the: petitioner
I%:.1§'?6;"?8 and order
da.'i:w:21.3.G3 saiamgmd petitien by
hawever to file a
frmh V1'~f;3rAif gfiéfien on all legal
gmuzutia. :'.Ea.' : Ex~R'?'.. 0:: the basis
of s1éifi:d ' herein has preferred
.;$«m<$'faa'§;:'e*:i?:tié;--h'§etiti<:n under Sectinm 27 (2) (1')
Rent Act, 1999. The
the requimment of the schedule
atraxztw as fa11owa:-
'Petitinanser suhmim that his family
cssnsism of himself, his wife Smt.
Vijayalahhmi, aged 45 yaara, his two
saxza, Havancat, agfi about 23 years, and
S. 'Jasu, aged 18 yezatra, and his daughter
3, Pushpa, aged ahmzt 21 years, all are
% flv
""'"°*W"" "WWW 'f«W:,'wwA.a wa" mmawsmwamm Wma"-W Qwfififlf KW %%§¥§'W%%%..=,=.
3. Easing aggrieved
wwm mmwwsm my m%~amwmam%..m wmm awziwwaai aw iwxwmmmmm wmvm kgwwms wk awmmmmafi Mmm m.;we..2m" 53% mwmwmazm Mflfiéé m:;a,:%=a;mA:" mfi .E£&fi%&"Wé?aM% M§mwM
-17..
'mnafidvc, genuine, hzmcst and nut
with axzzy cabiique mauve ."
in supper! of his case, the
axa.x:r::.m5=w himaeif" as. PW11
mam;m' " titan, he ham' a'é:1fi_jé'ittedV
H..R.:L,1%m64;96 ipsravigus
filed by him for demafifiéifi. and
this pawn isjfm at'
flsmaéifian admits
that in in the front
- side am}. is in {he bacimida and
téaai: E3s:¢PF:6% Véiifipravcd plan, the pczwticm
%%ggm§;:%%i%: ;~;e;;:31 o».a; mkmcéhaa to be dmaxished but ha
hééa: in raspeact cf the twa shops.
a13é$'*fhat if tha shops are nest demeslishad,
Qmstruat the 119113: and that the V617;
are aentizfizing in the mm shape. A
af Ex~P5 mamas it appmnt that the plan
has hem. appmveé fur thve: purpose of denmlitizm of
/_;£...
-uw '-w'~Imr~"I1»Wu<'eo.m wwx:
- 18 -
the fiiifihfidiflfi property as well as me ah-:>;:':va;V,'.T nca
stem have bean initiated by the petitipfiét':
sack méatfian mf fihe tenant;
arhczps 1'! fin the ather '& "
mm" ed by me pvetiti£$t:§'t*._I1efé£.'?g wfhn gma
that they are mz:xa'.,.%;_ts i£1"'ré§§§;3é fiAt._ of and
that ihesy are whenever
aw-wnmmwwmfiflfiefiwfi Msmgvem j«<g..._w:_.f.xwca WW' %MR.NflE$W%.& wzmm (33% %fi%¥&N.%"E'&Mfi §*§%€"7.%% fi®ifiE%;"'§" wfi Kfi%Nfi-Wfiaflfiy. HEGW QQURT W?' KKRWWTAKW HIGH
the getitianar It is
signifimant mm» :%h'séic1'§:¢:3fit:e was given by
Fwa-& ff. 1 prevéeua eviction
was held to be not
with the gv:g1A.mm at the pctitianxar and in
steps taken by the: petitioner
t¢::1a::1£s whasc prcmiaes waste
for the, gurposc ef dezazmlitian and
V as per Ex-P6 the aanofifivn plan, the
h in the said proceeding, rajwted the
faéquizvamemt vi the pefifianer hemir: and the same
«fie.
- 19 ---
was uphaéazl by this Ctaurt. In the pre:sen4t.vV_u'!fyfi¢;_ti<:zcz
pefiésrmz, the psoaitien remaina the
stepa whaiseever has been
fiefitésrmuar herezin to get tfw ? f¢=n~"a
reaped af {Inc ether
ta be: dac.m;va1iahce&:;._fiL}n§iéif}_ the
trial {Iiaurt was that the
petititmegf a cast ragardirlg
the in qumticm. for the
purjf:;_&a;e« xweccraatructiezz. A perusal
wwm tmwwma Mm" mmmmmsmsmm uwmsm »:mAmms:::¢§ Em? yammmfigmmm wmmm vmwmwi wr flkmfifiéfiiflmfi. Mimi"? mwmm W?" mM%Nm¥»%i&§»?e m£;.m%i;%%;E my Niifiw fl
af the judmé * ma' 1 caurt in
13 to 19, paras 26
tax 2'if~--...az$éi" gsar:;1 '2;f}.«:7tt>. 28 which has been cranflrmcd
mar dated;21,3.G3 in
98 (Em-R6 and R7 xcapcctively)
to the: pleadings and evidance on
the instant case which are mtracted
céearly fie I101: make out any change in
fl...
- 21 -
the petitianar that the respendent; maid agxizifizge in
the ssfiéiedtzle yremises as lszvng as the
Ema fihafm mmamad in theirJrespee§§iii§
answar was that it was not
the zmpand-ant tar: 'éscijzccluité?
gm-mim. can ha§';'% .: em had
ccraeiéxdafi that to put
2.1? which is a
said petition was
in the instant case alao
has iia detafl"*:i:iaQuVéa_a§tZ _tfiésgidexxae of the petitioner
V'm@...__§r03a- ficn Where: the
§£:.ti*t§.&f2s:::*v..v4:hg;g. :"'a=i;a*£ed that he cannot put up
2.....c&ns.t§*§§%éEiai: ':§§iiheut demtaiitiacz.-n at 111% exte' ting' twat:
admittad that he has nae: filed any
V the tenanta czf the said sharps and that
ashaps am nst damalished, the harass cannot
E5' mags:-atmcteé and that the tenants are ec:ntinu.1ng'
'-flaws"; mwwmx mm" m~mawmmmmm mxwm %v»w§,>4§'§5g§3"§§ wzw mmwmmamfifl Maww a,,;m..am' cgw ammmmumm Wfifiw mmm Q? mmwmm WQM ccmm QF %L&W\%.¢&'¥€'§&.K¢§& §~%M~.§°H
fi,.
.. ..
in film aaifi shaps and in the face caf the efifieme of
Fwa-:3 & 3, the petitiaoner could
yremiwa snrithcsut demclishing
hwmm WWW Cflfififflfi mwmm Wfifiw
that it is not nwessary ft};
shczps and also the faciflgat flicks: if
mquim, P'Ws--2 as .3 shops
555.:
Q
§
3
@
Q
3
Q
X
in thank' §accupaii{3;;i,--. has. rightly
crrmcludcd in the
arviszismue at' rwa-2 & :3. It
:3 aim plan v7m., Ex-P6.
'§"'h¢mfc:re juatified in further
%g1m: V'f}:§:vVV'___ pa¢Vt:.:itis9ncr had obtained the
with an intcnfican ta vacate the:
scheduia premisees and that the
. auf mqukfimmt was uni pmvead.
mmwm m¢.V~:{js..w3%.22 WW Wwmfilfiflfififikfl WWQW $;§:;3U§%'¥
A czomyarzscz' :1 91" mg pleadmg' a and
an mmrd aa well aa on p¢n1aa1 of the
um ':aMz.at"M 35
mtigm grassed by the trial Ccurt and this Court in
a
5; .
3
3
5
.
3 /4' HEGW _ 24 ..
5:23 the paint of demimon and tfic étamgé caunscl has rclieci upcm th: case afHARI'~2II'€GTC3N H:3U'smA xsrwm mm ANGTHER 2259 .
an the quasticsfiafL_:£§§ésia§§I_aV:1*2reaumpfien with regard ta _ the Ieamcti mmfimm Mfifgfi fifliflf W?' mmmmm mm 5&3???' QW Cvciunafii" 3:13.: relied upon the ésciaémm -- Ithe case cf P. simmmagymmkk %%%%§1::n;TffL*L%% $1' LRS. Va 1<.s. %M§n§%z:G:v3RA£mm Arcpm¢a in IL? 2004 I-{AR §3ggf'm age $9.132: cf Saecfion 2712} (:1 on um £39.; (311 tha same point, anezethcr : " V . &xpI$.11. §i:'smf; . ' arms fiivision Beach. at this cam in the G, EHGFJKATH AND GTHERS Vs V. '§§§£.A1;§DRAPRAKASH reponm in 11.12 2004 mm has been citad and anather deciaion in the 45,4.
~ W W ww-W W» ww"ww='ww»Ma'w% Wmww 3,.»-awn; W?" mflfiwfliflfiifla EWHWW fimwflf fiimfl mmasmi mar mmwmmmm mmm wzmsam wk" mmmmawam WWW mmmzm aw Mmmmmwa. mum mmmm M9" gmmwméama. Mum mfimw my wamwfiagwmw mmwm%
-25..
sass at' am. max. saaaswarfiamm vs SMT, ssmzgs. rezpmrted in 11.1? 2093 KAR m7 has ff _ relifi upan 13:» contend that the ., "
estaksfiiséa ba»I3..a.ffim under Sacha' I1 ("1'}y Sccfxzsna 23 ta .31 of 1999 d¢ci.§iqfi':~--::x"
am: mm as %«BHima.ma Vs is:
293.3 {2} SEC. 32c;% to point sag caused ts tfiz 1aad1=e:a:;§;fQd thggsvidion petition Eyeing mjeatezi, in the cam of 2.0.
%ANn*kk%[A3§%3THER Vs mm LEKI-IA AIR SCW 4245 is rcfied upon to is the heat judge cf his . iv,_vg¢ég.id¢n%ia"§:__£e%iuircment and anathaar decision in the KRISHNAPPA T. & ANOTHER vs % %r:;;g1réa~a?ra reported in 3981 (2) TEL} 225 £3 cited emgna that it is the landlord ta chem his 51'.
- 26 ---
premiaea wfiiash ia suitable for his; need far rewvesxy of pmsmaicn.
E2. 'Eh¢m aannm: be 7. AV regard fin the §r0pG%i'f,i4ZJ%3E_'_1aj£3:.«VCi ;li$"i¥'I1 fieaimlana but in tha of tiie and svidemse an findings of the previauusy é§4:;mPamd t9 the §1fia.d,§3.'1g§;§ scccmd mund cf and in my View the nanawmw mwwmm we" swmwmrmmm mawm g¢.k¥,@%: aw mmmmmmm MMM~i %I%9U£f'4"%" {W WWN%"§'M(»a% MGM fiflifim" fifii mmmmm Wifiéfi sfimm" Q? §€fi%NA"§'fi%fi M3"
61 at' the Rent Act as mfi a,s1vthc 1:«@::ipI=e$s. éfrwjudicata, the mliance fiha i.*:§:.rnHe§m'(§§unae1 for the petifinnar on the 'zzj%:sT:f3;a%:é2iati«.j§:ii$';:i£.iiion$ wmlld 'M cf m:~ assistance facts and circumstances of this wmm mwmma WW' mmmzwmmwm warm; &m.W..,;=m mm" wmmmmxma. WEWM &,;mum at' fimamflameam mam mmm aw K%%%M?&%% Mmm amgm Q? MRNAFAM WWW Q
-27- I 3:3. in viva»; clef my answer to paint I'I§::u...V the afizmtiva, paint Na:-.2 dues mt wmideratriau.
3%. Hausa H.R.CJ'i'fi.§413f!l§3 is this maréaian petififnn is it is agar: fin»: 'éhev u fresh eviction.
pefifiitm am him and if such be mnmieerefi :+:3*z'i" cf in
acmrzianca: ,.-'té bear theftr own came.
I "'* em;
% ix 3 3 33/25, x 1 .05