Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Hasina Khatun vs The State Of Assam And 3 Ors on 16 September, 2022

Author: Michael Zothankhuma

Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                                          Page No.# 1/3

GAHC010181672022




                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/6058/2022

            HASINA KHATUN
            D/O. ASGOR ALI SHEKH, W/O. ABUL KASHEM, VILL. KALNOI, P.O.
            MEDORTARI, P.S. FAKIRGANJ, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783330.



            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.
            REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM,
            SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT., GUWAHATI-06.

            2:THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE ASSAM

             UZAN BAZAR
             GUWAHATI-01.

            3:THE DISTRICT SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER DHUBRI

             ASSAM
             P.O. AND P.S. DHUBRI
             PIN-783301.

            4:THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROJECT OFFICER

             JAMADARHAT
             ICDS PROJECT
             CHIRAKUTI
             ASSAM
             PIN-783330

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MR M J QUADIR

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
                                                                         Page No.# 2/3




                                BEFORE
              HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                      ORDER

16.09.2022

1. Heard Mr. M.J. Quadir, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the petitioner has been working as an Anganwadi Helper at 35 No. Kalnoi Anganwadi Centre under the Jamadarhat I.C.D.S. Project, Chirakuti, Dhubri. The petitioner is aggrieved with the Advertisement dated 12.05.2022, whereby the post of Anganwadi Worker in the 35 No. Kalnoi Anganwadi Centre is to be filled up. The petitioner's grievance is that the eligibility criteria for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker in terms of the Advertisement dated 12.05.2022, requires a candidate to be between 18-44 years as on 01.01.2022. The petitioner being 47 years, is unable to participate in the selection process.

2. The petitioner has accordingly made a challenge to the age limit prescribed in the Advertisement dated 12.05.2022 for direct recruitment to the post of Anganwadi Worker.

3. The petitioner's counsel submits that the present case is a covered case, in terms of the order dated 11.04.2019 passed in WP(C) No.2481/2019, wherein the petitioners therein were allowed to submit a representation to the authorities, to consider relaxing the overage of the petitioners, to enable them to participate in the promotional process for the post of Anganwadi Worker. He accordingly prays that the petitioner should be allowed to file a representation Page No.# 3/3 to the respondents to consider relaxing the petitioner's age, so as to enable her to participate in the selection process, pursuant to the Advertisement dated 12.05.2022.

4. This writ petition has filed on 13.09.2022. On considering the fact that the last date of submission of the application forms, in terms of the Advertisement dated 12.05.2022 was 24.05.2022, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has missed the bus, for allowing her to file a representation for relaxation of age and making a challenge to the said advertisement, which should have been done prior to the last date for submission of the application forms, i.e. 24.05.2022.

5. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant