Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 4]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Dinesh Kumar vs . Milkhi Ram & Anr. on 21 April, 2022

Author: Chander Bhusan Barowalia

Bench: Chander Bhusan Barowalia

Dinesh Kumar vs. Milkhi Ram & anr.

.

RSA No. 113 of 2021 21.04.2022 Present: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

Mr. Rajinder Singh Thakur, Advocate, for the respondents.

Reply on behalf of respondents is stated to have been filed. However, the same is not on record.

Registry is directed to trace and place the same on record.

Rejoinder, if any, be filed within three weeks.

Learned counsel for the respondents states that respondent No.2 has expired. Let consequential steps be taken within three weeks. List thereafter.

(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 21st April, 2022 (himani) ::: Downloaded on - 22/04/2022 20:06:56 :::CIS