Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Joy M.A vs The Secretary on 28 February, 2014

Author: K. Vinod Chandran

Bench: K.Vinod Chandran

       

  

  

 
 
                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                            PRESENT:

                      THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN

                THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2014/13TH CHAITHRA, 1936

                                   WP(C).No. 8555 of 2014 (T)
                                      ---------------------------

PETITIONER :
--------------------------

            JOY M.A., S/O.ANTONY,
            MACHINGAL HOUSE, PANTHALOOR P.O.,
            THRISSUR.

             BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON

RESPONDENT :
----------------------------

            THE SECRETARY,
            REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,
            THRISSUR.PIN-680 003

             BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOUSHAD THOTTATHIL

            THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
             ON 03-04-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
             FOLLOWING:




sts

WP(C).No. 8555 of 2014 (T)
---------------------------------------

                                           APPENDIX

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
-------------------------------------

EXHIBIT P1.          TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT OF KL-42 A9510.

EXHIBIT P2.          TRUE COPY OF THE RC BOOK OF KL-42 A9510.

EXHIBIT P3.          TRUE COPY OF THE TEMPORARY REGISTRATION DATED 28/2/2014.

EXHIBIT P4.          TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR REPLACEMENT WITH
                     COVERING LETTER AND LEASE AGREEMENT DATED 20/3/2014.

EXHIBIT P5.          TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.5509/2014 DATED
                     26/2/2014.


RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:                   NIL




                                                    /TRUE COPY/


                                                    P.A.TO.JUDGE




sts



                K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J
      - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                W.P(C) No. 8555 of 2014
      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

       Dated this the 3rd day of April, 2014


                      J U D G M E N T

Petitioner contends that he had applied for replacement of vehicle, producing a vehicle, which is in his possession, on a valid lease agreement. Ext.P4 application is not accepted by the Registering Authority, since the petitioner is not the registered owner of the vehicle. By the judgment in M.Raveendran v. R.T.O & another [(1995) 1 KLJ 96], this Court had considered this matter and has found that it is enough that the applicant have a valid agreement for holding the vehicle.

2. In that view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of as follows:-

The respondent shall accept and consider WPC.8555/2014 : 2 : Ext.P4 and pass appropriate orders within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment irrespective of the fact that the petitioner is not the registered owner of the replacing vehicle, but if he is in possession of a valid agreement and he complies with the other procedures in accordance with law.
Writ petition disposed of.
Sd/-
                    (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE)

jma            //true copy//


                               P.A to Judge