Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Priyanka vs The Regional Transport Authority on 24 May, 2017

Author: M.V.Muralidaran

Bench: M.V.Muralidaran

        

 

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT               

DATED: 24.05.2017  

CORAM   

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN            

W.P.(MD)No.9694 of 2017  
and 
W.M.P.(MD)No.7442  of 2017   


R.Priyanka                                                       ... Petitioner


Vs.

1.The Regional Transport Authority,
    Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District.

2.The Regional Transport Officer,
    Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District.                                     ....
Respondents  

PRAYER : Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the
petitioner's Mini Bus to operate from Hindu College, Chettikulam Junction and
Vadasery Bus Stand bearing Registration No:TN-27-6163  as per the Transport 
Commissioner's circular letter in R.No.90919/E2/2000 dated 29.11.2000 while
ply on the route   Kottar Government Hospital to Karkadu forthwith.

!For Petitioner         : Mr.H.Velavadhas

For Respondents : Mr.K.P.Krishnadas         
                                                    Government Advocate


:ORDER  

The petitioners seeks for a Writ of Mandamus Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner's Mini Bus to operate from Hindu College, Chettikulam Junction and Vadasery Bus Stand bearing Registration No:TN-27-6163 as per the Transport Commissioner's circular letter in R.No.90919/E2/2000 dated 29.11.2000 while ply on the route Kottar Government Hospital to Karkadu forthwith.

2.The learned Government Advocate takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice if the representation of the petitioner's request transfer application is directed to be disposed of, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

4.In view of the limited scope of the prayer, without going into the merits of the matter, respondents are directed to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, dated 15.05.2017, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of .......... weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

5.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

To

1.The Regional Transport Authority, Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District.

2.The Regional Transport Officer, Nagercoil,Kanyakumari District. .