Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Asn.Of Unified Assn. Of Unified Telecom ... vs Union Of India on 21 March, 2023

Bench: Surya Kant, J.K. Maheshwari

                                                 1

     ITEM NO.22                          COURT NO.9               SECTION X

                              S U P R E M E C O U R T O F      I N D I A
                                      RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                 Writ Petition(Civil)   No.268/2012

     ASN.OF UNIFIED ASSN. OF UNIFIED TELECOM SERVICE                  Petitioner(s)
     PROVIDERS OF INDIA THR. ITS SECY. GEN.

                                               VERSUS

     UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                                            Respondent(s)

     (FOR ON IA 58489/2012, FOR               ON IA 39297/2013    & IA No. 1/2012 ­
     STAY APPLICATION)

     WITH
     T.C.(C) No. 165/2013 (XVI­A)

     Date : 21­03­2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT
                         HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI

     For Petitioner(s)
                                  Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR (Not Present)
                                  Mr. Pranav Sachdeva, Adv.

                                  Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv.
                                  Mr. Manu Krishnan, Adv.
                                  Mr. Vipul Singh, Adv.
                                  Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Adv.
                                  Mr. Victor Das, Adv.
                                  Ms. Anwesha Padhi, Adv.
                                  Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR

                                  Mr. Mansoor Ali Shoket, Adv.
                                  Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar, AOR
                                  Mr. Nitin Kala, Adv.
                                  Mr. Kunal Singh, Adv.
                                  Mr. Karun Sharma, Adv.
Signature Not Verified
                                  Ms. Anupam Ngangom, Adv.
Digitally signed by               Mr. Vishal Sagar, Adv.
VISHAL ANAND
Date: 2023.03.22
18:01:46 IST                      Mr. Tanmay Jain, Adv.
Reason:
     For Respondent(s)
                                  Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv.
                                  Mr. Ajay Bhargava, Adv.
                                  Mrs. Vanita Bhargava, Adv.
                                     2

                     Mr. Aseem Chaturvedi, Adv.
                     Mr. Manjul Vaajpeyi, Adv.
                     Ms. Trishala Trivrdi, Adv.
                     Ms. Abhipriya, Adv.
                    For M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR

                     Mr. B. Krishna Prasad, AOR
                     Mr. Praveen Kumar, AOR

                     Mr. Arpit Srivastava, Adv.

                     Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Adv.
                     Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Adv.
                     Ms. Suman Yadav, Adv.
                     Ms. Priyanka M.p, Adv.
                     Ms. Nikhita Khetrapal, Adv.
                     Ms. Srishti Prakash, Adv.
                     Ms. B. Vijayalakshmi Menon, AOR

                     Mr. Harsh Kaushik, AOR

          UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                             O R D E R

Taking into consideration the averments made in Interlocutory Application No.40047/2018 seeking deletion of Petitioner Nos. 1 and 5, the said application is allowed and the aforesaid petitioners are ordered to be deleted from the array of parties. Taking into consideration the averments made in Interlocutory Application No.27139/2023 in Writ Petition and Interlocutory Application No.27116/2023 in T.C. No.165/2013 seeking change of name of Respondent No.5, both the said applications are allowed. Let the cause title be amended accordingly.

As regards to Petitioner Nos.2, 3 and 4, learned counsels for the said petitioners seek and are granted four weeks’ time to have instructions.

Post the matters for hearing after four weeks.

  (VISHAL ANAND)                                       (KAMLESH RAWAT)
ASTT. REGISTRAR­cum­PS                             ASSISTANT REGISTRAR