Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare ... vs Acit Cir 7(1), Mumbai on 14 January, 2021

                                                                    ITA Nos. 4399 & 4483/Mum/2009
                                                                Assessment Years: 2002-03 & 2003-04

                                                                                        Page 1 of 3

                   IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
                          MUMBAI "J" BENCH, MUMBAI

                     [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and,
                           Saktijit Dey, (Judicial Member)]

                            ITA Nos. 4399 & 4483/Mum/2009
                           Assessment Years: 2002-03 & 2003-04


Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Health Care Ltd.                 ............................Appellant
P & G Plaza Cardinal Gracias Road,
Chakala, Andheri (E),
Mumbai-400 009
[PAN: AAACP 6332 M]


Vs

ACIT, Circle-7(1),
Mumbai                                                      ............................Respondent


Appearances by

Yogesh Thar for the appellant
A. Mohan for the respondent

Date of concluding the hearing       :       January 13, 2021
Date of pronouncement                :       January 14, 2021


                                         O R D E R

Per Bench:

1. These appeals filed by the assessee, calls into question the correctness of the order dated 31.03.2008, passed by the learned CIT(A)-XXXII, Mumbai in the matter of assessment u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 2002-03 and 2003-04.
2. When these appeals were called out for hearing, the ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that he has filed the necessary declaration under Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3 of 2020) and is awaiting for final resolution of the matter under the said scheme.

He submitted that upon completion of the necessary formalities, he will withdraw the ITA Nos. 4399 & 4483/Mum/2009 Assessment Years: 2002-03 & 2003-04 Page 2 of 3 appeals. In response to the suggestion from the Bench, he fairly accepted that he has no objection to the appeal being dismissed as withdrawn as long as his right for revival of the appeal are protected, in the event of, for some unfortunate reason, the matter being not settled under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.

3. The ld. DR also did not object to course so suggested.

4. In view of the above, we dismiss these appeals as withdrawn, subject to be rider that in the unlikely event of matter not being resolved under the Vivad se Vishwas scheme, the assessee shall have liberty to approach the Tribunal for restoration of his appeal.

5. In the result, these appeals are dismissed as withdrawn - subject to the observation above. Pronounced in the open court today on the 14 January, 2021.

        Sd/-                                                                        Sd/-
Saktijit Dey                                                                  Pramod Kumar
(Judicial Member)                                                             (Vice President)

Mumbai, dated the 14 day of January, 2021
Roshani, Sr. PS

Copies to:             (1)    The Applicant           (2)   The respondent
                       (3)    CIT                     (4)   CIT(A)
                       (5)    DR           (6)        Guard File

                                                                                         By order
True Copy


                                                                        Assistant Registrar
                                                             Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
                                                                 Mumbai benches, Mumbai