Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Satish Vyankoji Vijapure vs The State Of Maharashtra on 19 July, 2022

Author: Bharati Dangre

Bench: Bharati Dangre

                                 1/5                        28 BA-4388-21.doc


         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                  BAIL APPLICATION NO.4388 OF 2021


Satish Vyankoji Vijapure                       ..     Applicant

                       Versus

The State of Maharashtra                       ..     Respondent
                                       ...
Ms.Anjalli Patil with Ms.Mallika Sharma for the Applicant.
Mr.S.V.Gavand, A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.
                                       ...

                          CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.
                          DATED : 19th JULY, 2022

P.C:-



1.      The applicant came to be arrested on 20/10/2021 in

connection with the C.R. which invoke Sections 323, 328, 376,

420, 504, 506(2) of the I.P.C. At present, he is incarcerated in

Arthur Road Central Prison and seeks his release on bail.

2.      The prosecutrix, who is aged 35 years, reported to the

police station that she was working as T.C.. On 26/06/2014,

she received a message on Facebook from the applicant. They

being introduced to each other,              exchanged their mobile

numbers and remained in contact with one another on phone.



M.M.Salgaonkar




  ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2022                      ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2022 07:45:24 :::
                                  2/5                28 BA-4388-21.doc


Thereafter, they met in person and the applicant proposed her

for marriage, by giving an impression that they will solemnize

the marriage, after six months.

3.      The narration of the prosecutrix is to the effect that she

started trusting the applicant and since, he was in need of

money, she used to arrange for the amount from time to time.

The payment made by her to the applicant from March 2015 to

February 2020 has been alleged to be Rs.7,47,580/- in form of

cash.       Further, the prosecutrix has also stated that she

transferred various amounts in the name of his friends by

Google-pay and this amount is to the tune of Rs.88,000/-.

        The prosecutrix allege that she parted with the sum of

Rs.24,00,000/- from time to time to the applicant and accused

him of being abusive. When she insisted for performance of

marriage, it was revealed to her that he was already married

at the insistence of his father, but he assured her that he would

divorce his wife.

4.      It is alleged that on 29/02/2020, by spiking her drink, he

committed sexual intercourse with her and when the

prosecutrix confronted him about the said act, he apologized to

her. She further narrate that she continued to render fnancial

assistance to him. On 03/02/2021, one woman called her and

M.M.Salgaonkar




  ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2022              ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2022 07:45:24 :::
                                    3/5                        28 BA-4388-21.doc


informed her that the applicant had established physical

relationship with her and she has also paid money to him. The

prosecutrix then realized that the applicant had defrauded her

and she was made to part with Rs.24,00,000/- and was also

subjected to forcible sexual intercourse on 29/02/2020. This

resulted in lodging of the complaint, invoking the offence of

rape alongwith the offence of cheating against the applicant.

5.      Learned counsel Ms.Anjali Patil has invited my attention

to a complaint dated 14/06/2021 fled by the present applicant

with Sr.P.I., Dharavi, Mumbai where the applicant has levelled

accusations against the prosecutrix and he alleged that the

prosecutrix was forcing him for performance of marriage and

she had forced him for establishing sexual relationship under

the threat that she will commit suicide. A reference is also

made to a loan amount obtained from a jeweller to the tune of

Rs.1,50,000/- and the applicant repaid the said loan and

receipts to that effect were also tendered. It was also alleged

that the prosecutrix was forcing him to perform marriage by

divorcing his legally wedded wife.

        Alongwith          the   said    complaint,      an     affdavit-cum-

declaration, under the signature of the prosecutrix dated

14/02/2021, is also placed on record. The said undertaking

M.M.Salgaonkar




  ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2022                        ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2022 07:45:24 :::
                                  4/5                     28 BA-4388-21.doc


refers to a gold necklace, being given to the applicant, which

was mortgaged with Ambika Jewellers and it is recorded that

the applicant had returned the gold necklace from the said

jeweller to the prosecutrix.

        The deposit receipts and several transactions are also

placed on record.

6.      The      prosecutrix,    aged   35   years,     is    capable         of

understanding the consequences of her act and accused the

applicant that he has obtained money from her on various

occasions and has cheated her. In contrast, prior to lodging of

the complaint, the applicant himself had reported to the Senior

P.I., Dharavi Police Station through his counsel, about the

misdeeds of the prosecutrix and his complaint is prior in point

of time.

7.      In any case, the charge-sheet has been fled on

completion of investigation and further, judicial custody of the

applicant becomes unnecessary. The applicant is arrested on

20/10/2021 and he faces the accusations spread over for a

period of 7 years, preceding the said complaint.                           The

relationship shared by the two has clearly surfaced in the

charge-sheet.          Whether   the    amount    advanced          by      the

prosecutrix to the applicant, is by playing fraud, would be a

M.M.Salgaonkar




  ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2022                   ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2022 07:45:24 :::
                                  5/5                  28 BA-4388-21.doc


matter of trial. The applicant, therefore, deserve his release

on bail. Hence, the following order.

                                 : ORDER :
   (a)           Application is allowed.

    (b)          Applicant - Satish Vyankoji Vijapure shall be

released on bail in connection with C.R.No.770 of 2021 registered with Dharavi Police Station on furnishing P.R. Bond to the extent of Rs.25,000/- with one or two sureties of the like amount.

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of case so as to dissuade him from disclosing the facts to Court or any Police Offcer. The Applicant should not tamper with evidence.

(d) The applicant shall mark his attendance before the Investigating Offcer on frst Monday of the month,till framing of charge.

(e) The applicant shall not establish contact with the prosecutrix, either personally or through any other mode of contact and shall not threaten her in any manner.

( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) M.M.Salgaonkar ::: Uploaded on - 21/07/2022 ::: Downloaded on - 22/07/2022 07:45:24 :::