Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 12]

Chattisgarh High Court

Manish Raisagar vs State Of Chhattisgarh And 3Ors. 83 ... on 15 January, 2019

Author: Ajay Kumar Tripathi

Bench: Ajay Kumar Tripathi

                                                              1


                                                                                                    NAFR
                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                                             Writ Petition (S) No. 931 of 2008

                      Manish Raisagar, aged about 40 years, S/o Shri R.S. Raisagar, R/o A-23, Type-
                        III, Income Tax Colony, Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.), District Raipur (C.G.)
                                                                                             ---- Petitioner
                                                          Versus
                     1. The State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary to the Govt. of C.G., Public
                        Works Department, DKS Bhawan, Mantralaya, Raipur (C.G.)
                     2. The C.G. Public Service Commission, Through The Secretary to the C.G. Public
                        Service Commission, Raipur (C.G.)
                     3. The Examination Controller C.G. Public Service Commission, Raipur (C.G.)
                     4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Janjgir, District Janjgir (C.G.)

                                                                                         ---- Respondents
               For Petitioner          :            None.
               For Respondent Nos.1 & 4:            Ms. Richa Shukla, Deputy Government Advocate.
               For Respondent Nos.2 & 3:            Shri Y.C. Sharma, Advocate.


Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 15.01.2019

1. Court is informed that the writ application has become infructuous.

2. In view of the same the writ application is dismissed as having become infructuous.

                                 -                                                      Sd/-

                                                                              (Ajay Kumar Tripathi)
                                                                                  Chief Justice
Brijmohan