Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Abhinaya Xavier (Minor) vs Union Of India on 24 April, 2012

Author: A.M.Shaffique

Bench: A.M.Shaffique

       

  

  

 
 
                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                           PRESENT:

                         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE

                TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/4TH VAISAKHA 1934

                                  WP(C).No. 6520 of 2012 (L)
                                      --------------------------

PETITIONER(S):
-----------------------

          1. ABHINAYA XAVIER (MINOR),
              REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND
              S. JANETMARY 85A (NEW NO.17/237),
              SOUTH ERAYUMANTHURAI, KOVILVILAGAM,
              THUTHOOR (P), POOTHURAI,
              KANYAKUMARI DIST., TAMIL NADU-629 176.

          2. AGUNA XAVIER (MINOR),
              REPRESENTED BY HER NEXT FRIEND
              S. JANETMARY, 85A (NEW NO.17/237),
              SOUTH ERAYUMANTHURAI, KOVILVILAGAM,
              THUTHOOR (P), POOTHURAI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT,
              TAMIL NADU- 629 176.

             BY ADVS. SRI.V.M.SYAM KUMAR,
                          SRI.YASH THOMAS MANNULLY,
                          SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P).,
                          SRI.V.N.HARIDAS.

RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------

          1. UNION OF INDIA,
              REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
              MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI.

          2. STATE OF KERALA,
              REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY,
              GOVERNMENT OF KERALA.

          3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEENDAKARA
             COASTAL POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT, KERALA.

          4. SRI.UMBERTO VITELLI, MASTER OF THE VESSEL,
              M.V. ENRICA LEXIE A FOREIGN FLAG VESSEL,
              FLYING THE FLAG OF ITALY, PRESENTLY ANCHORED
              WITHIN THE COCHIN PORT LIMITS.

          5. SRI.LATORRE MASSIMILIANO,
              ITALIAN NATIONAL EMPLOYED ON BOARD
              THE VESSEL M.V. ENRICA LEXIE,
              PRESENTLY ANCHORED WITHIN THE
              COCHIN PORT LIMITS REPRESENTED BY
              THE MASTER OF THE VESSEL.

WP(C).No. 6520 of 2012 (L)




      6. SRI.SALVATORE GIRONE,
         ITALIAN NATIONAL EMPLOYED ON BOARD
         THE VESSEL M.V. ENRICA LEXIE,
         PRESENTLY ANCHORED WITHIN THE COCHIN PORT LIMITS,
         REPRESENTED BY THE MASTER OF THE VESSEL.

      7. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF SHIPPING,
        DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF SHIPPING,
        JAHAZ BHAVAN, WALCHAND H.MARG, MUMBAI-400 001.

     8. PRINCIPAL OFFICER,
        MERCANTILE MARINE DEPARTMENT,
        WILLINGTON ISLAND, NORTH END. P.O., KOCHI- 682 009.

      9. COMMANDANT, COAST GUARD HEAD QUARTERS,
         DISTRICT NO.4, KOCHI-682 004.

    10. INDIAN SPACE SCIENCE DATA CENTRE, ISTRAC,
        INDIAN SPACE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION,
        NEW BEL ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 231.


        BY ADV. SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR, ASG. OF INDIA.
        R2 & R3 BY GOVT. PLEADER MR.ABDUL SALAM.
        R4 TO R6 BY SRI.SUHAIL DUTT, SENIOR ADVOCATE.
                        SRI.V.J.MATHEW, SENIOR ADVOCATE.
                        ADVS. SRI.DILJECT TITUS,
                               SRI.VIPLAV SHARMA,
                               SRI. ABHIXIT SINGH,
                               SRI.BIJISH B.TOM.


      THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
      ON 24-04-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
      FOLLOWING:




rs.



                           A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                         W.P.(C).No.6520/2012-L
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            Dated this        the 24th day of April, 2012.

                              J U D G M E N T

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition as the subject matter of the writ petition has been amicably compromised by the parties. The learned Government Pleader appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 submitted that any settlement between the parties shall not affect the interest of the State. No doubt, the State's interest cannot be infringed by any bilateral contract between the other parties to this case. Therefore, recording the above, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn.

Sd/-

(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE) ms