Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Pritam Kumar vs State Of Himachal Pradesh & Others on 29 May, 2023

Bench: Vivek Singh Thakur, Sushil Kukreja

                                                1




    IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

                                    CWP No.2785 of 2023




                                                                           .
                                    Date of Decision: May 29, 2023





    Pritam Kumar                                                                ...Petitioner.





                                             Versus

    State of Himachal Pradesh & others                                      ..Respondents.





    Coram:
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge.
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge.

    Whether approved for reporting?1

    For the Petitioner:             Mr.Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
    For the Respondents:            Mr.Anup   Rattan,   Advocate                      General,
                                    alongwith  Mr.Sidharth   Jalta,                    Deputy
                                    Advocate General.



    Vivek Singh Thakur, J (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner shall be satisfied in case he is permitted to make representation for redressal of his grievances, stated in the petition, to the Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD, Shimla, H.P., with further direction to decide the same in a time bound manner.

2. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that in case any representation is preferred by the petitioner, same shall be decided, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible.

3. In view of above, petitioner is permitted to make representation to the competent authority alongwith supported 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?

::: Downloaded on - 30/05/2023 20:31:03 :::CIS 2

documents on or before 31.05.2023. In case such representation is preferred, same shall be decided by the competent authority on or before 07.06.2023, by passing a speaking and reasoned .

order, after affording opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner, if desired so. Order shall be communicated to the petitioner immediately thereafter. Interim stands vacated.

However, petitioner shall not be compelled to join back at previous place of posting till the decision of representation, and he may avail leave of kind due, and in case he opts to join back, such joining shall not be made reason for rejecting the representation.

4. Petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms, so also pending application(s), if any.

5. Petitioner is permitted to produce a copy of this order, downloaded from the web-page of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, before the authorities concerned, and the said authorities shall not insist for production of a certified copy but if required, may verify it from Website of the High Court.

(Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge.

(Sushil Kukreja), Judge.

May 29, 2023 (Purohit) ::: Downloaded on - 30/05/2023 20:31:03 :::CIS