Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Kerala High Court

Union Of India vs Jose Sebastian on 30 June, 2006

Author: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

Bench: Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan

       

  

  

 
 
                IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

                                PRESENT:

         THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL  B.RADHAKRISHNAN
                                   &
                THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR

         TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2012/7TH CHAITHRA 1934

                      WP(C).No. 22276 of 2007 (Z)
                      ---------------------------
  OA.671/2003 of CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH DATED
                               30.06.2006

PETITIONER(S):
-------------

     1.  UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY
         THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
         MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAILWAY BOARD), RAIL BHAVAN
         NEW DELHI.

     2.  THE GENERAL MANAGER,
         SOUTHERN RAILWAY, PARK TOWN P.O., CHENNAI-600 003.

     3.  THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
         INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, NEW DELHI.

         BY ADV. SRI.JAMES KURIAN, SC, RAILWAYS

RESPONDENT(S):
--------------

     1.  JOSE SEBASTIAN, S/O. P.A.SEBASTIAN,
         JUNIOR ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT (RETD.)
         DIVISIONAL ACCOUNTS OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY
         TRIVANDRUM-14, RESIDING AT KRISHNA LODGE
         KANNERTHUMUKKU, TRIVANDRUM-14.

     2.  SOUDAMINI HARIDAS, W/O. MR. HARIDAS,
         JUNIOR ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT, DIVISIONAL ACCOUNTS
         OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM-14
         RESIDING AT KMRA-125, KUNNATHUMUKKU, TRIVANDRUM-14.

     3.  R.SHAILAJA NAIR, D/O. MR. K.N.PILLAI,
         JUNIOR ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT, DIVISIONAL ACCOUNTS
         OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM-14
         RESIDING AT ROSE COTTAGE, TC 15/882, COTTON HILL
         TRIVANDRUM-10.

     4.  AJITHA T.NAIR, W/O. MR. S.THULASEEDHARAN
         NAIR, JUNIOR ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT
         DIVISIONAL ACCOUNTS OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY
         TRIVANDRUM-14, RESIDING AT UDIYANNOOR PUTHEN, VEEDU
         KUTHIRAKALAM P.O., VEMBAYAM, TRIVANDRUM.
LSN                                                        --2--

                                --2--


WP(C).No. 22276 of 2007 (Z)


     5.  SINDHU HARIKUMAR, W/O. MR. HARIKUMAR,
         JUNIOR ACCOUNTS ASSISTANT, DIVISIONAL ACCOUNTS
         OFFICE, SOUTHERN RAILWAY, TRIVANDRUM-14
         RESIDING AT TC 16/2429, SINDHU NIVAS, VALIYASALA
         TRIVANDRUM.

     6.  CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,
         REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR
         CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM.

         R1 TO R5 BY ADV. SRI.T.C.GOVINDA SWAMY
                  BY ADV. SRI.P.V.ABDUL SAMAD

       THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL)  HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD  ON
      27-03-2012, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:




LSN

WP(C).No. 22276 of 2007 (Z)



                               APPENDIX


PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:


P1:  COPY OF THE O.A. NO. 671/2003 WITH ANNEXURES DATED NIL.


P2:  COPY OF THE REPLY STATEMENT WITH ANNEXURE DATED 14/01/2004.

P3:  COPY OF THE REJOINDER DATED 20/02/2004.

P4:  COPY OF THE ADDITIONAL REPLY STATEMENT DATED 23/04/2007.

P5:  COPY OF THE ORDER O.A. NO. 671/2003 DATED 30/06/2006.

P6:  COPY OF THE ORDER IN CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 57/03 DATED 03.06.2003.




RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL



                                        //TRUE COPY//


                                        P.A. TO JUDGE.


LSN



                THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN &
                            C.T.RAVIKUMAR, JJ.
                   ----------------------------------------
                         W.P.(C)No.22276 of 2007
                   ----------------------------------------
                  Dated this the 27th day of March, 2012

                                   JUDGMENT

Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.

The short issue is whether the respondents ,who are Railway employees, are entitled to arrear of pay on revision of scales with effect from 1.1.1996. They were refused such benefit till 18.2.2003 as per Annexure-A3. That has been interfered with by the Tribunal. We find no rationale to refuse relief to the Railway employees particularly when such relief has been granted to the employees of the other sector covered by the Pay Commission Order. We find no jurisdictional error or legal infirmity to say that there is any injustice against the establishment on the basis of the impugned order. No ground made out for interference under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India.

The writ petition fails and accordingly it is dismissed. No costs.

Sd/-

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN Judge Sd/-

C.T.RAVIKUMAR Judge TKS/27.3.2012