Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Kerala High Court

Henna Davis vs Neethin Thomas on 31 May, 2024

Crl.Rev.Pet No.514/2024                          1/1

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
                                           PRESENT
                          THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
              Friday, the 31st day of May 2024 / 10th Jyaishta, 1946
                           CRL.REV.PET NO. 514 OF 2024
            CRA 272/2022 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT - VI, ERNAKULAM
       CRMP 2097/2021 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE - VIII, ERNAKULAM
   REVISION PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER

           HENNA DAVIS, AGED 33 YEARS, MANNATH HOUSE, SANKAR NAGAR,MARADU,
           COCHIN, PIN - 682304.

   RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT

       1. NEETHIN THOMAS, AGED 33 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
          VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
       2. T P THOMAS, AGED 66 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
          VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
       3. DAISAMMA THOMAS, AGED 63 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR.
          GEORGE VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
       4. NIRMAL THOMAS, AGED 28 YEARS, THOTTATHIL HOUSE, KKRA-35, FR. GEORGE
          VAKAYIL ROAD, MARADU, COCHIN, PIN - 682304.
       5. NEETHU ANN THOMAS, AGED 36 YEARS, PATHIYAMOOLAYIL HOUSE, NEAR ST.
          JUDE CHURCH, ERAMALLOOR, PIN - 688537.


        This Criminal Revision Petition coming on for orders upon perusing
   this petition and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.SANTHI.M, G.RANJU
   MOHAN, SREEHARI M.B, THEERTHA NAIR A.P, DEV NATH A & PYARIN
   B.KURUVITHADAM, Advocates for the petitioner, the Court passed the
   following:


                                            ORDER

This revision seen filed without producing the order of the Magistrate and the order in Criminal Appeal alone seen filed.

Call for explanation from the Registry who numbered this matter, how this Crl.R.P has been numbered without producing the original order where from the appeal, which is the subject matter of this revision, arose.

If necessary, cancel the number and return the revision for curing the defect.

Sd/-

A. BADHARUDEEN, JUDGE 31-05-2024 /True Copy/ Assistant Registrar