Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court - Orders

Bulbul Jha @ Rajesh Kumar Mishra @ Rakesh ... vs The State Of Bihar on 2 December, 2022

Author: Anshuman

Bench: Anshuman

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55564 of 2022
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Bulbul Jha @ Rajesh Kumar Mishra @ Rakesh Kumar Mishra S/o Late
                 Janardhan Mishra R/V- Baikunthpur, P.S.- Rajapakar, Distt-Vaishali.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-12-2022

Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual mode.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 266 of 2021, lodged under Sections 302, 328, 120(B) and 34 of Indian Penal Code later on charge- sheet submitted under Sections 328, 302, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 34(A), (B)(1), 27(A), (B) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

As per prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioner is to provide wine in the name of health tonic to the deceased (father of the informant).

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55564 of 2022(2) dt.02-12-2022 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and there is no direct allegation against him in this case rather whatever allegations have been made, are on the basis of circumstantial evidence and at this level those circumstantial evidence may not be looked into. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2021 and there are 7 criminal cases pending against the petitioner in which five cases were earlier and 2 cases have recently been filed, after filing of the present case and charge-sheet has already been filed in this case.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that allegation of preparing spurious wine is against the petitioner, which has resulted into death of persons.

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner therefore his bail petition is hereby rejected.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) ritik/-

U         T