Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 3]

National Consumer Disputes Redressal

Amrita Rosha Jain vs Bhavendra Kumar & 2 Ors. on 29 October, 2018

          NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION  NEW DELHI          FIRST APPEAL NO. 2273 OF 2017     (Against the Order dated 21/03/2017 in Complaint No. 155/2015      of the State Commission Punjab)               1. AMRITA ROSHA JAIN  W/O. SHRI. ABHISHEK JAIN.
R/O. W-62, GREATER KAILASH-1.  NEW DELHI-110048 ...........Appellant(s)  Versus        1. BHAVENDRA KUMAR & 2 ORS.  R/O. HOUSE NO.501, MARINERS HOME, SECTOR-56.  GURGAON  HARYANA  2. H.S. ANAND, DIRECTOR, MARINERS BUILDCON INDIA LIMITED.  R/O. C-10, KAILASH COLONY.  NEW DELHI-110048  3. MRS. HARJAS KAUR ANAND , DIRECTOR, MARINERSBUILDCON INDIA LIMITED.  R/O. C-10, KAILASH COLONY.  NEW DELHI-110048 ...........Respondent(s) 

BEFORE:     HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,PRESIDING MEMBER   HON'BLE MR. DINESH SINGH,MEMBER For the Appellant : Mr. Sukumar Pattjoshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sunil Mund, Advocate Mr. Somesh Dubey, Advocate Mr. Manvendra Singh, Advocate Mr. Siddharth Bhatli, Advocate Mr. Rakshith Srivastava, Advocate For the Respondent :

Dated : 29 Oct 2018 ORDER     The forenoon session extended upto 1.10 p.m.  As learned senior counsel for the appellant Mr. S. Pattjoshi had a case before Hon'ble High Court at 2.30 p.m., the afternoon session was started at 1.45 p.m. Learned senior counsel for the appellant Mr. S. Pattjoshi was not ready to argue the matters on merit.

The father and mother of the appellant were present.  The mother of the appellant made a request to hear arguments.

          In the interest of justice another opportunity was provided to argue the matters at the end of the Board.

At the end of the Board, at 4.15 p.m., learned counsel Mr. Siddhartha Bhatli argued the matters for the appellant. The father and mother of the appellant were (again) present.

We perused the material on record. 

The appeals are dismissed.

Reasoned judgment to follow.

Till the pronouncement of the reasoned judgment execution proceedings shall remain stayed.

  ...................... DR. S.M. KANTIKAR PRESIDING MEMBER ...................... DINESH SINGH MEMBER