Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Mohan Lal vs State Of Rajasthan (2024:Rj-Jd:29339) on 18 July, 2024

Author: Farjand Ali

Bench: Farjand Ali

[2024:RJ-JD:29339]

          HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                           JODHPUR
     S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 8850/2024

 Mohan Lal S/o Shri Heera Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Babalo
 Ka Bas, Fitkasani, P.s. Kuri Bhagtasani, Jodhpur (At Present
 Lodged Central Jail, Jodhpur)
                                                                       ----Petitioner
                                        Versus
 State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                     ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)             :     Mr. Birbal Ram Bishnoi
For Respondent(s)             :     Mr. SK Bhati, PP



                   HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order 18/07/2024

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S.No.                           Particulars of the Case
     1.     FIR Number                                        353/2023
     2.     Concerned Police Station                          Kudi Bhagtasani
     3.     District                                          Jodhpur Rural West
     4.     Offences alleged in the FIR                      Under Sections 420 &
                                                             408 IPC
     5.     Offences added, if any                             Under Sections 467,
                                                                  471 & 381 of IPC
     6.     Date of passing of impugned order                 02.07.2024


2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that the offences alleged are triable by a Court of magistrate. No case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his (Downloaded on 19/07/2024 at 10:02:27 PM) [2024:RJ-JD:29339] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8850/2024] incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4. I have considered the submissions made by both the parties and have perused the material available on record. The offences alleged are triable by a Court of magistrate. There is high probability that the trial may take long time to conclude. In light of these facts and circumstances, it is deemed suitable to grant the benefit of bail to the petitioner in the present matter.

5. Accordingly, the instant bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner as named in the cause title shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(FARJAND ALI),J 67-chhavi/-

(Downloaded on 19/07/2024 at 10:02:27 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)