State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
The Chief General Manager, State Bank Of ... vs Src Projects Private Ltd., Chief ... on 30 March, 2022
Daily Order IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI - 600 003. BEFORE Hon'ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT Thiru. S. KARUPPIAH JUDICIAL MEMBER
Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER F. A. No.166/2017 (Against the Order dt.14.02.2017 made in C.C. No.44/2013 on the file of D.C.D.R.C., Salem) DATED THE 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2022
1. The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai - 400 021.
2. The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Srirangapalayam Branch, Ramakrishna Road, Salem - 636 007.
3. The Chief Manager, State Bank of India, No.310, Sipcot Staff Housing Colony, Mookandapalli - 635 126, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. .. Appellants / Opposite parties.
-Versus-
SRC Projects Private Limited, M. Paramasivam, Chief Executive, No.4 B, Gandhi Road, Lakshmipuram, Salem - 636 007. .. Respondent / Complainant.
Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties : M/s. J. Pothiraj Counsel for Respondent / Complainant : M/s. J. Ranjani Devi This appeal coming up before us on 30.03.2022 for appearance of appellant and for filing written argument of appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:
Docket Order No representation for appellant. Respondent present. This appeal is posted today for appearance of appellant, for filing written argument of appellant and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal.
When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the Appellant was not present. Hence, passed over and called again at 12.00 Noon. still, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- R. VENKATESAPERUMAL S. KARUPPIAH R.SUBBIAH MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER PRESIDENT