Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri.M. Venkatashamaiah @ Venkatesh vs Bangalore Development Authority on 10 January, 2025

Author: M.G.S. Kamal

Bench: M.G.S. Kamal

                                           -1-
                                                        NC: 2025:KHC:929
                                                     WP No. 8681 of 2024




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                      DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025

                                        BEFORE
                        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
                        WRIT PETITION NO. 8681 OF 2024 (BDA)

                 BETWEEN:

                 SRI.M. VENKATASHAMAIAH @ VENKATESH
                 S/O LATE MUNINANJAPPA
                 AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
                 R/AT DOOR NO 12/2
                 CHENNSANDRA VILLAGE
                 R R NAGAR POST
                 KENGERI UTTARAHALLI
                 MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 098.
                                                            ...PETITIONER

                 (BY SRI. K S CHANDRAHASA., ADVOCATE)

                 AND:

                 1.   BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Digitally
signed by             BY ITS COMMISSIONER
SUMA B N              KUMARA PARK WEST
Location: High
Court of              T CHOWDAIAH ROAD
Karnataka             BENGALURU 560020
                      EMAIL :[email protected].

                 2.   THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF
                      LAND RECORDS
                      BANGALORE SOUTH
                      KANDHAYA BHAVAN
                      K G ROAD
                      BENGALURU - 560 001.

                 3.   THE BEML EMPLOYEES
                      CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
                           -2-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC:929
                                     WP No. 8681 of 2024




     HAVING ITS OFFICE AT M/S BEML
     LIMITED, BANGALORE COMPLEX
     NEW THIPPASANDRA,
     BY ITS SECRETARY
     BANGALORE - 560 075.
     REPRSENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT/
     EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/SECRETARY
     PAN NO AAALTO689E.

4.   SRI B GIRIRAJA
     S/O SRI BASAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
     R/AT C/O ANANTHA KUMAR
     NO 35, 1ST MAIN, MAA NIVAS
     RAMESH NAGAR, MARATHALLI POST
     BANGALORE - 560 037
     PAN AFUPG9776J.

5.   SMT K POORNIMA
     W/O LATE B N SRINIVASA MURTHY
     AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
     R/AT NO 822 'A' BPCL
     SAHAKARNAGAR
     BANGALORE - 560 092
     AADHAR NO 992207635913.

6.   SMT DEEPTHI HARVE
     D/O K POORNIMA
     AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
     R/A C 24, GHARKUL SOCIETY
     SIDDARTHNAGAR LANE
     VAKOLA, SATACRUZ EAST
     MUMBAI- 40055
     AADHAAR 3794 1985 1368.

7.   SMT RUPA ACHARYA
     W/O SRI YOGISH ACHARYA
     AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
     R/AT NO. 1215, "NANDANANDANA"
     8TH CROSS, 2ND PHASE
     VBH COMPLEX, GIRINGAR
     BANGALORE - 560 085.
                            -3-
                                    NC: 2025:KHC:929
                                 WP No. 8681 of 2024




     SMT LAKSHMI JAYANNA
     W/O SRI JAYANNA K
     SINCE DECEASED
     REPRSENTED BY HER
     HUSBAND AND DAUGHTERS

8.   SRI JAYANNA K.,
     S/O LATE SUBBAIAH
     AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS
     R/AT NO 5, SWYAMKRUSHI
     11TH MAIN ROAD
     PADMANABHANAGAR
     BANGALORE - 560 070.

9.   SMT ASHWINI
     W/O SRI SAI VENKATESH
     D/O SRI JAYANAN K
     AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
     R/AT NO 2181, 17TH CROSS
     SAMPIGE ROAD
     MALELSHWARAM
     BANGALORE - 560 003.

10. SMT ARCHANA
    W/O SRI G L SUBBARAM
    D/O SRI JAYANNA K
    AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
    R/AT PLOT NO 4,
    NEW SBH COLONY
    NEAR NTPC GUEST HOUSE
    MAREDPALLY, NERHUNAGAR
    HYDERABAD - 560 026
    TELANGANA.

11. SRI A SEBASTINE
    S/O LATE ANTHONY DASS
    AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
    R/AT 14/1, 1ST MAIN ROAD
    SOWRIMANI NIVAS
    RAMESHNAGAR
    BANGALORE - 560 037
                           -4-
                                        NC: 2025:KHC:929
                                    WP No. 8681 of 2024




    PAN NO ASBPS7562C.

12. SRI P N SRINIVAS
    S/O NANJAIAH
    AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
    R/AT NO 2593, 11TH MAIN ROAD
    E BLOCK, 2ND STAGE
    RAJAINAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 010.

13. SRI SATISH MARIYAPPA
    S/O A N CHIKKAMARLYAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
    R/AT NO 168, 5TH MAIN
    5TH STAGE, IST PHASE
    BEML LAYOUT
    RAJARAJESHWARI NAGAR
    BANGALORE - 560 098
    PAN NO ABOPS99995H.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. B. VACHAN., ADVOCATE FOR R1
    SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA LAGALI, AGA FOR R2;
    SRI. KUSHAL GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR
    SRI. N. BYREGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3, R5, R7, R9, R12
    SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
    SRI. BHARGAV G, ADVOCATE FOR R6 AND R13)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT
OF CERTIORARI TO MODIFY THE LAYOUT PLAN IN SO FAR AS
THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE LAND OF THE PETITIONER
BEARING KHANESHUMARI NO. 61 VIDE ANNX-PIP AND TO
HOLD THAT THE VARIOUS DEEDS UNDER ANNEXURE-V1 TO V9
-V1 TO V0 TRUE COPIES OF THE SALE DED DATED 28.11.2008,
15.12.2008, 8.04.2022, 8.0.2022, 14.09.2009, 21.09.2010,
4.05.2011, 3.09.2011, 12.04.2022 ARE NON EST IN THE EYE
OF LAW .

    THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:   HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL
                                      -5-
                                                        NC: 2025:KHC:929
                                                  WP No. 8681 of 2024




                             ORAL ORDER

The short grievance of the petitioner is that he is the owner of the land bearing Khaneshumari No.61 forming western portion of Sy.No.22, measuring East to West 22 yards and North to South 114 yards, totally measuring 2508 yards which is equivalent to 22572 sq.ft. as reflected in the report of the Taluka Surveyor dated 06.04.1961 produced at Annexure-A. That the said land was granted in favour of one Sri.Muninanjappa, the grandfather of the petitioner on 07.06.1979 and that revenue records are made in the name of the grandfather of the petitioner.

2. It is further case of the petitioner that respondent No.3-Society is forming a layout in the land adjacent to the land of the petitioner and in the process is claiming the eastern portion of the land belonging to the petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner had made a representation dated 30.06.2022 to the respondent No.2 as per Annexure-S seeking survey of the land belonging to the petitioner as well as the survey of the land belonging -6- NC: 2025:KHC:929 WP No. 8681 of 2024 to the respondent No.3- Society. That despite several rounds of follow-up, respondent No.2- authority has not taken any steps in causing survey done as sought for by the petitioner, constraining the petitioner to approach this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if a direction is issued to the respondent No.2 to conduct the survey and to furnish the report thereof, the purpose of filing the writ petition would be served.

4. In response, learned AGA submits given some time, survey as sought for, would be conducted and report of the survey would be furnished to the petitioner and the respondent No.3.

5. Submission is taken on record.

6. In that view of the matter, following;

ORDER (1) Petition is disposed of.

-7-

NC: 2025:KHC:929 WP No. 8681 of 2024 (2) Respondent No.2 shall conduct the survey as requested by the petitioner in the presence of the petitioner and the representatives of respondent No.3-Society.

(3) Since the parties are represented by their respective counsel, petitioner and representative of respondent No.3 shall make themselves available at the spot on 01.02.2025 at 11.00 a.m. and shall not expect any further notice from the respondent No.2, shall extend all cooperation in conducting of survey. (4) Parties are at liberty to issue memo of instructions.

(5) The respondent No.2 shall furnish the report of the survey to both the parties within a period of one week thereafter.

(6) It is made clear no observation or opinion is expressed with respect to the merits or otherwise of the case.

-8-

NC: 2025:KHC:929 WP No. 8681 of 2024 (7) It is further made clear that till the survey is conducted and report is furnished as directed hereinabove, the respondent No.3 shall maintain status quo with regard to the subject property. Cost of survey if any shall be borne equally by the petitioner and the respondent No.3-soiety.

SD/-

(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE RU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21