Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Sri S H Laxminarayan vs M/S Pavithra Housing Development Co Pvt ... on 6 July, 2010

Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar

Bench: Mohan Shantanagoudar

 

1
Bi '2?-E EHGH CQURT SF £{A%ATAI{A AT Bé\HGé'.Lif3RE

DATEE TE-HS "§"I~E 695 BAY €313' JULY 2316

BEFGRE

THE HQNBL-E MR.JU$'1'I%E mama   T' T

c:.m.P.HQ.1G9 G1'?  «L 
B WIEEN; % %

Sri. S. H.  ym  »

Sim Late S. R.  Ram  

Aged abaut 72 ymm, ' ' 

R/at 239.442, 2&5 Crwa,

Imizfanam, I Stage, H "   i'   ._ 
Bfialere-560938.    

{By sx;   & Rm, Adm.)

1. 2s§,*;s;  Qevefmpmemt

'    """ 

VA  Ce1:1}pa,:13,i_I'a§stm*&d mafia: the
 =p2*c**y':¥7&§i9£2?x:!;1s%;%~r;2:£'*':.he Campanies Act

 .   Registwed Gficse at

!'€¢';3i §,'Bi&:*}'is $u*ee:t Cress,
 '3'ew'n§

 Bamatifsm,

' ..  by im

 Sfi'. H' S. $mnt1m Kzzmr.

H: S? Siddagowda,
R} at Ea.6'?, YT'! Laymzt,



 

Batman 'Fawn,

Baxgazm -~ 563 025.    % 

---- *4' £24. :,*'~ _{2-..=2»_W %

Q33; Sri. H. 3.  §adv. my R2) AdJ;.$H¥% A} 

M cm misc. Pefifion fi1ed  W%m;;o;~am?" ;%°Q°'"
A1*h%tra1:1?on arfi Cionxziliatkxn Act, '1'9'3 6s§ p:r'a;;'ing«. tk) *..f" 'COYveg,€#rc,Q
apgoail-gt. an arh'%m*amr far E.d_i2J,£§€§;&ti€3IiA.§i3?   Co..~,,,4.
'rm cm? mmam' $"»"*1'3*~.__fi3r '.a~"¢j'"m.'Vjm;a;Vi£;x:_  the '"'°'"°*"""

Caurtmaietkxae   _     -@€¢¢Jt,Cxe.&;
   Ps+o++m"bu
   9_n...u." 3.;    my

'rm   11(6) of the
Arbz'tz'at?mn" film"  "A'm;,...  praying far
mm' :54; &<W1m%;a%A -xzm   pg rm' fer adjudiuatian

in   and Cennciliatien Act,

         

 '   I that firm ;::eu'1:ir::ne:r entswad

  af saie dam: 13.94.9505 with the

 «;_f§£ pummu of 3 rwidmitietl glat bearing
 a¢;%:$§%T"m%m;ng me; x mm fixmad 'm zma. bearing

    % and 96 mmaurm 2.5 aexm sittzateé at
  Villg, Varthaar E-£3133,  m South

Ir/>



 

firbitzrafiezz am ilianciliatian Act, 1995 mi 

 slwii ® at   

 

4-;  fiard m the    X 

evhwcmtazw, it Efi a $3, f&f$'t'afI;f?2fi é;~3;:s§{;f£:eé.:_v .

5.  ,   

fa  "  vR:é¥:zre&' men-inst

 

Judge,    my, emu-ax
Chamhmaé  mgamm, gs
appomwa  an dsiapujaa begween

tim    ms;  %§f tlm a t datmi

33¢  am Arhiuaficm am pmm

 %  %  ;

   petitiaetx fa ampmq:

Sdli
Iudge

3 'V27?



MSGJ: C.M.P.N0.109/2007
05.10.20 10

ORDERS ON 'FOR BEING SPOKEN 'ro'~t  Q

The respondents were placed  ._t17.e"  

matter. However, due to typogrézjphioatlfiveiafofi,' 'th4'e~f of the Advocate is shown as if._he of respondents. Thus, the :I}isté1'1'xed_:1teed:s to be corrected and in p1ace"*ot j."A[1A3y '4f*I',jSgShivakumar, Adv. for R2)" 0CCuI'I'i;'1'g__ in Fz1ge-- "Rd 8: R-2 ~«» service held-'s't1ffifetent dt': to be shown. t_f:)rdei_9e'dfIa.cg:ordi-xtgiv. Ot'fi(_:e is e 'testify the said mistake and fresh' certified' rrdiayvbe issued. Sd/-~ Judge' sps