Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Hannan Mollah vs Unknown on 16 March, 2011

Author: Ashim Kumar Roy

Bench: Ashim Kumar Roy

38   16.03.2011                              C.R.M. 1438 of 2011
Sd
                  Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of
                  Criminal Procedure filed on 15th February, 2011 in connection with
                  Sonarpur G.R.P.S. Case No. 13/09 dated 17.08.2009 under
                  Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25/27 of the
                  Arms Act.
                                              And

                       In the matter of : Hannan Mollah.
                                                             .... Petitioner (in Jail).
                             Mr. Kanai Lal Dutta.
                                             ....For the Petitioner.

                             Mr. R. K. Ahmed.
                                            ....For the State.

                             Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the
                    learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Perused the case
                    diary.


                              It is submitted by the learned counsel of the petitioner that
                    three other co-accused persons viz. Kasem Sk. alias Kasim, Mukta
                    Mollah, as well as Alauddin Mollah, who are standing on the self-same
                    footing has been granted bail by this Court and the present petitioner
                    is in custody for about 93 days.


                             The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State has not
                    disputed the fact that the present petitioner is similarly placed with
                    the other co-accused, who have already been enlarged on bail by this
                    Court. Accordingly, we are of the view that the petitioner's prayer for
                    bail may be considered favourably.


                             The applicant/accused be released on bail on furnishing P.R.
 Bond of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety of like amount on condition that
after his release, the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer of
the case twice in every week on Monday and Wednesday between 5-00
p.m. to 7-00 p.m. till the conclusion of the trial. The petitioner shall
not commit any offence and shall not tamper with the prosecution
case while on bail.
         The application for bail accordingly stands disposed of.


                                      (J. N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE)

(ASHIM KUMAR ROY, J.)