Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 2]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

State Of Haryana And Ors vs Balwan Singh And Anr on 17 July, 2018

Bench: Krishna Murari, Arun Palli

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                             CHANDIGARH


                                                       LPA-587-2018 (O&M)
                                            Date of decision:- 17.07.2018


       State of Haryana (through its Home Secretary) and
       others
                                            ...Appellants
                       Versus

       Balwan Singh and another
                                                           ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI, CHIEF JUSTICE
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI

Present:- Mr. Lokesh Sinhal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana,
           for the appellants.
                      * * * *
KRISHNA MURARI, C.J. (ORAL)

This appeal under clause X of the Letters Patent Act has been filed by the State of Haryana challenging the judgement and order of the learned Single Judge dated 23.05.2017 with delay and latches of 302 days. An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (in short the Act) seeking condonation of delay having duly supported by an affidavit has also been made.

2. The only explanation submitted in the affidavit is that delay has occurred on account of the fact that the concerned file was being moved from one department to another seeking opinion to file LPA and permission. In our considered opinion, this explanation of time having been consumed in sending the file from one office to another seeking opinion and permission for filing the appeal cannot constitute sufficient ground to condone the delay. The litigant has to be vigilant about his rights and where the matter is taken so casually as is the case in hand the delay is not liable to be condoned.

1 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 22-07-2018 16:52:53 ::: LPA-587-2018(O&M) 2

3. The application under Section 5 of the Act accordingly stands dismissed.

4. As a consequence, the appeal also stands dismissed on account of delay and latches.

(KRISHNA MURARI) CHIEF JUSTICE (ARUN PALLI) JUDGE 17.07.2018 Amodh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No 2 of 2 ::: Downloaded on - 22-07-2018 16:52:53 :::