Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore
Autodesk Asia Pte Limited, Bangalore vs Dcit, Bangalore on 5 August, 2021
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCHES "C", BANGALORE
Before Shri Chandra Poojari, AM & Shri George George K, JM
IT(TP)A No.293/Bang/2015: Asst.Year 2006-2007
M/s.Autodesk Asia Pte Limited The Dy.Commissioner of
3, Fusionopolis Way v. Income-tax (International
#10-21 Symbiosis Taxation), Circle 1(1)
Singapore - 138 633. Bangalore.
PAN : AAFCA6398D.
(Appellant) (Respondent)
Appellant by : Miss.Mansa Ananthan, Advocate
Respondent by : Sri.Pradeep Kumar, CIT-DR
Date of
Date of Hearing : 05.08.2021 Pronouncement : 05.08.2021
ORDER
Per George George K, JM
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against final assessment order dated 27.01.2015, passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 r.w.s. 144C of the I.T.Act. The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.
2. The solitary issue raised is whether sale of software was liable to be taxed as royalty.
3. Brief facts of the case are as follow:
The draft assessment order was passed on 28.03.2014, wherein it was concluded that payment of US$ 2,06,52,308 received by the assessee-company would constitute royalty within the meaning of Article 12(3) of the DTAA and as per the provisions of section 9(1)(vi) of the I.T.Act. The assessee filed objections to the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP). The DRP issued directions dated 19.12.2014. The DRP rejected all the 2 IT(TP)A No.293/Bang/2015. M/s.Autodesk Asia Pte Limited.
objections raised by the assessee. Accordingly, the final assessment was passed on 27.01.2015.
4. Aggrieved by the final assessment, the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal. At the very outset, the learned Counsel for the assessee submitted that the issue in question is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence P.Ltd. v. CIT reported in [2021] 432 ITR 471 (SC). The learned Departmental Representative was not able to controvert the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the assessee. In view of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, which is identical to the facts of this case, we hold that the payment of US$ 2,06,52,308 received by the assessee-company would not constitute royalty and cannot be brought to tax. It is ordered accordingly.
5. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced on this 05th day of August, 2021.
Sd/- Sd/-
(Chandra Poojari) (George George K)
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Bangalore; Dated : 05th August, 2021.
Devadas G* Copy to :
1. The Appellant.
2. The Respondent.
3. The DRP-2, Bengaluru
4. The CIT (IT) Bengaluru.
5. The DR, ITAT, Bengaluru.
6. Guard File.
Asst.Registrar/ITAT, Bangalore