Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

Meghanad Behera And Others vs State Of Odisha & Others .... ... on 11 December, 2025

                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                      W.P.(C) NO.33454 OF 2025

                 Meghanad Behera and others                      ....       Petitioners
                                                           Ms. B. Sahoo, Advocate

                                               -versus-

                 State of Odisha & Others                        ....      Opp.Parties
                                                          Mr. J.K. Khandayat, ASC
                 CORAM:
                 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
                                ORDER
Order No.                      11.12.2025
  01.

1. Heard Ms. Bijaylaxmi Sahoo appearing for Petitioners and learned ASC-Mr. Khandayatray appearing for official Opposite Parties.

2. The subject matter of this writ petition is substantially similar to one in W.P.(C) No.20855 of 2025 between Ananta Narayan Mishra v. State of Odisha disposed of by the Coordinate Bench vide order dated 01.08.2025, and, therefore learned counsel submits that her client would be satisfied if a direction in terms of the said decision is passed on the representation at Annexure-2. Learned counsel also brings to the notice of this Court the decision in Ritanjali Giri@ paul v. State of Odisha(School & M.E. Deptt) & others, 2016 (I) ILR-1162 in support of her case.

3. Learned ASC-Mr. Khandayatray appearing for official Opposite Parties does not dispute the position as asserted by learned counsel for the Petitioners. It is a rule of adjudicatory process that similar cases should be treated similarly subject to all just exceptions.

Page 1 of 2

In the above circumstances, writ petition is disposed of directing Op. No.1 to consider the subject representation at Annexure-2 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks, which will include informing the Petitioners the result of such consideration.

It is open to the answering Opposite Parties to solicit any information or documents from the side of the Petitioners, as required for taking a decision on the subject representation. However, in that guise delay shall not be brooked.

Now, no costs.

(Dixit Krishna Shripad) Judge Prasant Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PRASANT KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Date: 12-Dec-2025 18:05:11 Page 2 of 2