Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Vaidic Dharma Samrakshak Sangh vs Subramanian Swamy on 21 August, 2023

2023:BHC-OS:8764-DB
                                                                         6-PILL-4368-2023


      Pdp
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                         ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

                   PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 4368 OF 2023


                 Dr. Subramaniam Swamy & Anr.                .. Petitioners
                             Versus
                 State of Maharashtra, through
                 Ministry of Law and Judiciary
                 Department.                                 .. Respondent

                                        WITH
                     INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 17754 OF 2023
                                         IN
                   PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 4368 OF 2023

                 Vaidic Dharma Samrakshak Sangh,
                 Through its president
                 Bheemacharya Balacharya Varakhedakar        .. Applicant

                 In the matter between:

                 Dr. Subramaniam Swamy & Anr.                .. Petitioners
                             Versus
                 State of Maharashtra, through
                 Ministry of Law and Judiciary
                 Department                                  .. Respondent

                                        WITH
                     INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 11666 OF 2023
                                         IN
                   PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) NO. 4368 OF 2023

                 Shree Vitthal Rukmini Temples
                 Committee                                   .. Applicant

                 In the matter between:

                 Dr. Subramaniam Swamy & Anr.                .. Petitioners
                             Versus
                 State of Maharashtra, through
                 Ministry of Law and Judiciary
                 Department                                  .. Respondent


                                                 1
                ::: Uploaded on - 21/08/2023         ::: Downloaded on - 22/08/2023 06:57:01 :::
                                                                              6-PILL-4368-2023


 Dr. Subramanian                 Swami,         petitioner-in-person,
 present.
 Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General with Mr. Milind
 More, Addl. Govt. Pleader for respondent/State.
 Mr.   Bheemacharya     Balacharya  Varakhedakar,
 present of applicant in IAL/17754/2023 in-person
 present.
 Mr. Shashikant Surana i/by Mr. Madhur Surana for
 applicant in IAL/11666/2023.


         CORAM: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. &
                ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
         DATE:            21st AUGUST, 2023


 P.C.:


 1.      Heard        the      petitioner-in-person,           Dr.      Saraf,       learned

Advocate General representing the State of Maharashtra, Shri. Surana, learned counsel for the applicant/intervener in Interim Application (L) No. 11666 of 2023 and Shri. Bheemacharya Balacharya Varakhedakar, who has moved the Interim Application (L) No. 17754 of 2023 on behalf of Vaidic Dharma Samrakshak Sangh (hereinafter referred to as "the Sangh").

2. As far as the prayer made by Shree Vitthal Rukmini Temples Committee is concerned, we permit the said Committee to make its submissions for the reasons that it is a statutory committee formed under the impugned enactment. Accordingly, Interim Application (L) No. 11666 of 2023 stands disposed of.

2 ::: Uploaded on - 21/08/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 22/08/2023 06:57:01 :::

6-PILL-4368-2023

3. Having heard Shri Bheemacharya Balacharya Varakhedakar in support of Interim Application (L) No. 17754 of 2023, we find that the Sangh does not have any locus to intervene in the PIL petition for the reason that under challenge in the PIL petition is the statutory validity of State Legislation and merely because the members of the said Sangh are devotees of God Shree Vitthal, Rukminee and their other Pariwar Devatas, it cannot be said that they are either necessary or proper parties. Prayer is, thus, rejected. Interim Application (L) No. 17754 of 2023 stands disposed of accordingly.

4. Learned Advocate General appearing for the State assures us that affidavit-in-reply will be filed within a week. Rejoinder affidavit may be filed by the petitioner-in-person within a week thereafter.

5. List the PIL petition on 13th September, 2023.

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Digitally signed by PRAVIN DASHARATH PANDIT Date: 2023.08.21 17:35:51 +0530 3 ::: Uploaded on - 21/08/2023 ::: Downloaded on - 22/08/2023 06:57:01 :::