Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gauhati High Court

Smt. Runu Hazarika vs The State Of Assam And 2 Ors on 28 November, 2024

Author: Michael Zothankhuma

Bench: Michael Zothankhuma

                                                                        Page No.# 1/2

GAHC010199992023




                                                                 undefined

                              THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
   (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

                                 Case No. : WP(C)/5246/2023

            SMT. RUNU HAZARIKA
            D/O BONGSHIDHAR HAZARIKA, PRINCIPAL, ITC MY FAIR LADY
            TRAINING CENTRE 15, SATYANATH BORA LANE, DIGHALIPUKHURI,
            GUWAHATI, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781001


            VERSUS

            THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 2 ORS
            REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT
            OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT,
            DIRECTORATE OF EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMEN TRAINING, ASSAM,
            REHABARI, GUWAHATI-781008

            2:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
            ASSAM STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR SCHEDULED CASTE
            LTD.
             SARUMATARIA
             DISPUR
             GUWAHATI-781006

            3:THE DIRECTOR
             EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMEN TRAINING
            ASSAM
             REHABARI
             GUWAHATI-78100

Advocate for the Petitioner   : MS. S B CHOUDHURY, MS. N D SARMA,Z R MAJUMDAR,MR.
S K DAS

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, EMPLOYMENT AND CRAFTSMAN
TRAINING,MR S P DAS
                                                                     Page No.# 2/2


                                 BEFORE
               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA

                                      ORDER

Date : 28-11-2024 Ms. Toshienla, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr. R Dhar, learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

Para 5 of the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent No. 2 states that in the context of making payment to the petitioner it is the Chairman-cum- Managing Director of NSFDC, New Delhi, who is to provide funds for implementation of the training programme. However, the said Chairman-cum- Managing Director is not a party in the writ petition.

List the matter after 2 (two) weeks.

Registry to reflect the name of Mr. R Dhar as counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 in the cause-list.

JUDGE Comparing Assistant