Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Gujarat High Court

Heirs Of Shanabhai Shindabhai Vasava vs State Of Gujarat on 14 June, 2018

Author: N.V.Anjaria

Bench: N.V.Anjaria

          C/SCA/8221/2016                                      ORDER




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8221 of 2016
==========================================================
                HEIRS OF SHANABHAI SHINDABHAI VASAVA
                               Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR JINESH H KAPADIA(5601) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1,1.1,1.2,1.3,1.4,1.5,1.6,
1.7,2, 2.1,2.2,2.3,2.4,2.5,2.6,3,3.1
MR MANAN MEHTA, ASST.GOVERNMENT PLEADER for RESPONDENT No.1
DELETED(20) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 4,6
MR PY DIVYESHVAR(2482) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 3,5
NOTICE SERVED(4) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1,2
==========================================================
 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.V.ANJARIA

                             Date : 14/06/2018
                              ORAL ORDER

Heard learned advocate Mr.Jinesh Kapadia for the  petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader  Mr.Manan Mehta for the respondent - State.

2. The   petitioners   have   challenged   order   dated  21.12.2015,   passed   by   the   Secretary,   Revenue  Department   (Appeals),   which   is   the   common   order  dismissing Revision Application No.8 of 2006 as well  as   Revision  Application   No.9   of  2006,   in  so  far   as  the   order   relates   to   dismissal   of   Revision  Application No.9 of 2006 preferred by the petitioners  herein.

Page 1 of 7 C/SCA/8221/2016 ORDER

3. The   revisional   proceedings   arose   from   order  dated   04.07.2006,   passed   by   the   Collector.   The  Collector   had   solicited   the   report   in   respect   of  Mutation   Entry   No.559   in   respect   of   land   bearing  Survey   No.415/1  situated   at  village  Asamali,   Taluka  Matar,   Kheda.   The   Collector   directed   forfeiture   of  the   land   to   be   vested   in   the   name   of   the   State  Government on the ground of breach of Section 73AA.  The   Collector   directed   to   dispose   of   the   land   in  terms of Sub­section (6) of Section 73AA and further  directed   to   recover   penalty   for   three   times   under  sub­section (7) of Section 73AA of the Code.  3.1 The   sale   transaction   took   place   on   18.04.1989.  Thereunder,   the   petitioners   sold   the   land   to   the  present   private   respondents.   Entry   No.559   was  mutated. In relation to the entry mutated, appeal was  preferred   before   the   Deputy   Collector,   thereafter  further   appeal   was   filed   before   the   Collector   who  solicited   report   from   the   subordinate   authority  and  proceeded under Section 73AA of the Code. According  to the Collector, there was a breach of the statutory  provision of Section 73AA of the Land Revenue Code,  Page 2 of 7 C/SCA/8221/2016 ORDER as   prior   permission   was   required   to   be   taken   for  purchasing   the   land   of   the   tribal,   which   was   not  taken. 

4. It is the contention of the petitioners that the  Collector   did   not   give   any   notice   under   Section  73AA(5)   of   the   Land   Revenue   Code.   The   petitioners  were   put   to   notice   about   taking   back   the   land   but  Collector did not record the statement of any of the  petitioners.   On   04.05.2006,   the   Collector   forfeited  the land in exercise of powers under Section 73AA(4)  and further ordered to dispose of the land under sub­ section (6) of Section 73AA of the Land Revenue Code  and   also   directed   to   recover   the   penalty   of  Rs.1,35,000/­   as   arrears   of   land   revenue   from  respondent Nos.3 to 5. 

4.1   This   led   the   petitioners   to   file   Revision  Application   No.9   of   2006,   whereas   the   private  respondent Nos.3 to 5 filed Revision Application No.8  of 2006 which both came to be dismissed by way of the  impugned order.

5. Section   73AA   of   the   Gujarat   Land   Revenue   Code,  1879,   deals   with   the   restriction   on   transfer   of  Page 3 of 7 C/SCA/8221/2016 ORDER occupancies from tribal to tribal or non­tribal. Sub­ section   (1)   provides   that   notwithstanding   anything  contained   in   Section   73,   an   occupancy   of   a   person  belonging to Schedule Tribe shall not be transferred  to   any   person   without   previous   sanction   of   the  Collector.

5.1 In the scheme of Section 73AA, sub­sections (4),  (5) and (6) read as under :

"(4) Where a tribal ­
 (a) in contravention of sub­section (1) of this   section,   or   of   sub­section   (1)   of   section   73A or of any other law for the time being   in   force,   transfers   his   occupancy   to   any   person   other   than   a   tribal   (hereafter   in   this   section   and   in   section   73AB   referred   to   as  "the   non­tribal")  at   any  time   on  or  after   the   date   of   commencement   of   the   Bombay   Land   Revenue   (Gujarat   Second   Amendment)   Act,   1980   (Guj.37   of   1980).  

(hereinafter in this section referred to as   "the said date"); or 

 (b) in   contravention   of   sub­section   (1)   of   section   73A   or   of   any   other   law   for   the   time   being   in   force   has   transferred   his   occupancy   to   a   non­tribal   at   any   time   before the said date, the   Collector   shall,   notwithstanding   anything   contained   in   any   law   for   the   time   being   in   force,   either   suo   motu   at   any   time,   or   on   an   application made by the tribal transferor or his   successor­in­interest   at   any   time   within   three   years   from   the   said   date   or   the   date   of   such   transfer,   whichever   is   later,   after   issuing   a   notice   to   the   transferee   or   his   successor­in­ interest as the case may be, to show cause why   the   transfer   should   not   be   declared   void   and  Page 4 of 7 C/SCA/8221/2016 ORDER after   making   such   inquiry   as   he   thinks   fit,   declare   the   transfer   of   such   occupancy   to   be  void   and   thereupon   the   occupancy   together   with   the standing  crops  thereon,  if any, shall  vest   in   the   State   Government   free   from   all   encumbrances.

(5)   Where an occupancy if vested in the State   Government   under   sub­section   (4)   and   such   occupancy was assessed or held for the purposes   of   agriculture   immediately   before   its   transfer   by   the   tribal   transferor,   the   Collector   shall,   after taking necessary action under sections 79A   and 202, give notice to the tribal transferor or   his successor in interest, as the case may be,  requiring him to state in writing within ninety   days   from   the   date   of   receipt   of   such   notice   whether he is willing to purchase the occupancy   and cultivate in personally, and if such tribal   transferor   or   his   successor   in­interest   agrees   to   purchase   the   occupancy   and   undertakes   to  cultivate   it   personally,   it   may   be   granted   to   him   on   payment   of   the   prescribed   occupancy   price.

(6)   If  within   the  said   period   of  ninety   days  the transferor or his successor in interest does   not   intimate   his   willingness   to   purchase   the   occupancy   and   to   cultivate   it   personally,   or   fails   to   pay   the   occupancy   price   within   such   period as may be specified by the Collector, the   occupancy  shall  be granted  to any  other  tribal   residing   in   the   same   village   or   in   any   other   village   situated   within   such   distance   from   the   village   as   may   be   prescribed,   on   the   same   conditions,   including   the   payment   of   the   occupancy price, as are specified in sub­section   (5), and if he is not  so willing,  it shall  be   granted   to   other   classes   of   persons   in   such   order   or   priority   at   such   occupancy   price   and   subject   to   such   conditions   as   may   be   prescribed."  

5.2 Sub­section   (5)   of   Section   73AA   above   thus   provides   that   where   an   occupancy   is   vested   in   the   Page 5 of 7 C/SCA/8221/2016 ORDER State   Government   under   sub­section   (4)   and   such   occupancy   was   subjected   to   assessment,   the   Collector   shall   give   notice   to   the   tribal   transferor   or   his   successor and require such tribal transferor to state   in writing within the stipulated time as to whether he   is   willing   to   purchase   the   occupancy   and   cultivate   personally. In the present case, the authorities have   jumped   the   aforesaid   stage   of   sub­section   (5)   of   Section   73AA.   After   the   land   was   treated   under   sub­ section (4) and made to vest in the State Government,   readily adverted to was the provisions of sub­section   (6). The Collector straightaway directed to dispose of   the   land   in   terms   of   sub­section   (6).   The   stage   of   sub­section   (5)   of   giving   notice   to   the   tribal   transferor or his successor so as to know whether such   tribal transferor is willing to purchase the land, has   been   skipped.   This   omission   is   an   error   of   law   amounting to non­compliance of the said provision.

6. As   a  result   of   above   discussion,   this   petition  is allowed as per the following order :

(i) The impugned order dated 21.12.2015, passed by  the   Secretary,   Revenue   Department   (Appeals),  Page 6 of 7 C/SCA/8221/2016 ORDER Ahmedabad, in Revision Application No.9 of 2006  is   hereby   set   aside.   Also   set   aside  consequently   is   the   order   of   Collector   dated  04.07.2006.

(ii) The case is remitted back to the Collector for  deciding   afresh   and   to   comply   with   the  provisions   of   sub­section   (5)   of   Section   73AA  of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879.

(iii) The Collector shall follow the requirements of  of Section 73AA(5) of the Land Revenue Code of  giving   notice   to   the   tribal   transferor   and  ascertaining   his   willingness   to   purchase   the  occupancy   and   the   procedure   contemplated  therein.

(iv)  The Collector shall take a decision thereafter  upon due compliance of Section 73AA(5) of the  Land Revenue Code.

(v)  The above exercise shall be completed within a  period of four months.

7. The   petition   stands   allowed   to   the   aforesaid  extent and in the aforesaid terms.

(N.V.ANJARIA, J) Gaurav+ Page 7 of 7