Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Sri Subodh Chintey vs The State Of Assam . on 10 July, 2015

     ITEM NO.24                              REGISTRAR COURT. 1                      SECTION XIV

                                    S U P R E M E C O U R T O F              I N D I A
                                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

                                        BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. M.V. RAMESH

     Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal(C) No(s). 36560-36561/2013

     SRI SUBODH CHINTEY                                                            Petitioner(s)

                                                          VERSUS

     THE STATE OF ASSAM & ORS.                                                     Respondent(s)
     (with interim relief and office report)

     Date : 10/07/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

     For Petitioner(s)
                                             Mr. Anupam Lal Das,Adv.
     For Respondent(s)
                                             Mr. Sanjeev Kumar,Adv.
                                             Ms Vartika Sahay, Adv.
                                             M/s Corporate Law Group,Adv.
                                             Ms. Pragya Baghel,Adv.
                                             Mr Neeraj Kumar, Adv.

                               UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                  O R D E R

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner is directed to furnish the fresh and correct address of respondent no.9 since the postal remarks are 'left'. Be furnished within two weeks time. Notice thereafter be issued.

In respect of respondent no.6, await service from the District Court. Send reminder.

In respect of respondent nos. 2 and 4, service is complete but none has entered appearance.

Counter affidavit has been filed by respondent nos. 3,5,7 and 8.

Respondent no.1 has failed to file counter affidavit inspite of opportunity provided. Further opportunity is therefore declined.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Hema Joshi Date: 2015.07.16 10:54:35 IST

List again on 16.9.2015.

Reason:

(M.V. RAMESH) Registrar