Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Madhya Pradesh High Court

Phool Chand Sahu vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 5 January, 2023

Author: Vivek Agarwal

Bench: Vivek Agarwal

                                                         1
                          IN    THE       HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
                                               AT JABALPUR
                                                    BEFORE
                                      HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK AGARWAL
                                             ON THE 5 th OF JANUARY, 2023
                                           WRIT PETITION No. 1116 of 2013

                         BETWEEN:-
                         PHOOL CHAND SAHU S/O SHRI BABULAL SAHU, AGED
                         ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCCUPATION: CHOKIDAR BEHIND
                         OF A.P. 03 E, ENGG. COLLEGE CAMPUS, JABALPUR
                         (MADHYA PRADESH)

                                                                                    .....PETITIONER
                         (BY SHRI ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA - ADVOCATE)

                         AND
                         1.    THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH THROUGH ITS
                               DIRECTOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION, SATPURA
                               BHAWAN BHOPAL (MADHYA PRADESH)

                         2.    PRINCIPAL GOVT. ENGINEERING            COLLEGE
                               JABALPUR (MADHYA PRADESH)

                         3.    JOINT DIRECTOR TREASURY ACCOUNTS AND
                               PENSION DIVISION (MADHYA PRADESH)

                         4.    DISTRICT      TREASURY        OFFICER (MADHYA
                               PRADESH)

                                                                                  .....RESPONDENTS
                         (STATE BY SHRI PIYUSH BHATNAGAR - PANEL LAWYER)

                               This petition coming on for admission this day, th e court passed the
                         following:
                                                          ORDER

Learned counsel for the petitioner when apprised of the Division Bench Decision of this Hon'ble High Court in Review Petition No.506/2012 (State of Madhya Pradesh & Others versus Smt.Shyama Bai) decided on Signature Not Verified Signed by: AMIT JAIN Signing time: 1/5/2023 5:36:33 PM 2 21.7.2014 wherein it is held that a work charged employee is entitled to earned leave of 120 days and Rule 7 of the Madhya Pradesh Work Charged Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977 enables the employee on earned leave and maternity leave to get benefit of leave salary equal to the rate of pay or salary which has been drawn for the month immediately prior to the month in which the leave is taken and does not permit encashment of leave of 120 days, prays for withdrawal of this writ petition.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(VIVEK AGARWAL) JUDGE amit Signature Not Verified Signed by: AMIT JAIN Signing time: 1/5/2023 5:36:33 PM