Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Orissa High Court

WP(C)/26665/2020 on 12 November, 2020

Author: K.R. Mohapatra

Bench: K.R. Mohapatra

                               W.P.(C) No.26665 of 2020




02.   12.11.2020        Due to outbreak of COVID-19, this matter is taken
                   up through Video Conferencing.
                        Heard Mr. S. Mohanty, learned counsel for the
                   petitioner and Mr. S. S. Kanungo, learned Additional
                   Government Advocate for the State-opposite parties.
                        The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for a
                   direction to the Tahasildar, Mathili-opposite party no.5
                   to delete the entry in Column No.6 from the R.O.R.
                   under Annexure-1 published in her name. Entry in
                   Column No.6 of the R.O.R. under Annexure-1 discloses
                   that the land is not alienable.
                        In course of hearing, Mr. Mohanty, learned
                   counsel for the petitioner brings notice of this Court to
                   the order of this Court dated 27.02.2019 passed in
                   W.P.(C) No.16307 of 2018 under Annexure-6, wherein a
                   similar question of law was decided and this Court while
                   deciding the matter directed the Tahasildar to consider
                   the same in accordance with law keeping in view the
                   circulars mentioned in the said writ petition, relevant
                   portion of the order is reproduced hereunder:
                               "In exercise of powers conferred by Sec.8-A of
                        the Odisha Government Land Settlement Act, 1962
                        ("OGLS Act"), the Government of Odisha amended
                        the Rules, namely, Odisha Government Land
                        Settlement Rules, 1983 ("OGLS Rules, 1983"). In
                        OGLS Rules, 1983, Rule-5-BB was inserted, which
                        provides    settlement    of    Khasmahal,     Nazul
                        Gramakantha Paramboke Abadi land for the
                        purpose other than homestead and agriculture. The
                        manner of settlement has been provided under Rule,
                             2



     5-BB. Power has been conferred to the Sub-Collector
     for settlement of the land under the Rule subject to
     approval of the Collector and compliance to the
     clauses enumerated therein. The procedure for filing
     of application has been stated under Rule-3.
     Thereafter the Government of Odisha in its Revenue
     and Disaster Management Department issued
     another notification dated 21.12.2018 for recording
     of Gramakantha Paramboke, Khasmahal, Nazul
     and Abadi category of land in favour of lawful
     occupants. Clause 8 of the said circular provides that
     the person in occupation of Gramakantha
     Paramboke, Khasmahal, Nazul or Abadi category of
     land has to file application for settlement of the same
     for the purpose for which it is being used, which
     shall be disposed of on merit by following the
     procedure prescribed in Schedule V or Schedule V-A,
     as Revenue and Disaster Management Department,
     this Court disposes the petition with an observation
     that in the event the petitioner files an application
     before the Tahasildar, Jaipur for ecording the land in
     his favour within a period of fifteen days from today,
     the Tahasildar shall disposes of the same within
     three months thereafter keeping in view the circulars
     mentioned supra.
             The petition is disposed of."

     He, therefore, prays for a direction to dispose of
the writ petition in the light of the ratio decided in
W.P.(C) No.16307 of 2018.
     Mr. Kanungo, learned Additional Government
Advocate for the State submits that he does not dispute
the factual position of the case. He, however, submits
that the petitioner has to make an application to the
Tahasildar, Mathili-opposite party no.5 for disposal of
the same in accordance with law keeping in view the
circulars governing the field.
                                     3



              Taking into consideration the submissions made
      by learned counsel for the parties, this Court without
      expressing any opinion on the merits of the case,
      disposes of the writ petition with a direction that in the
      event the petitioner files an application before the
      Tahasildar, Mathili-opposite party no.5 within a period
      of four weeks hence ventilating her grievances enclosing
      the relevant circulars governing the field, he shall do
      well to consider and take a decision on the same in
      accordance with law by passing a reasoned order as
      expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of
      six months from the date of filing of such application
      along     with   relevant    documents   as     well   as   an
      authenticated copy of this order downloaded from the
      website of the Orissa High Court.
              Authenticated copy of this order downloaded from
      the website of this Court shall be treated at par with
      certified copy in the manner prescribed in this Court's
      Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.


                                  ................................
                                  K.R. MOHAPATRA,J.

pks