Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Anil Kumar Kathpal vs Ministry Of Human Resource Development on 27 September, 2011

                                  1


              Central Information Commission
Room No.307, II Floor, B Wing, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama 
                     Place, New Delhi­110066
     Telefax:011­26180532 & 011­26107254 website­cic.gov.in

              Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000415

 Appellant /Complainant       :       Shri Anil Kumar Kathpal, 
New Delhi       
Public Authority              :       Central Board of 
Secondary Education 
                              Delhi (Sh. M.K. Arora, Dy. 
Secy/CPIO &
                              Ms Kavita Vazirani, 
Asstt.Secy)

Date of Hearing               :       27 September 2011    
Date of Decision              :       27 September 2011 
      
Facts:­ 

1. Shri   Anil   Kumar   Kathpal,   submitted   RTI  application   dated   26   August   2010   before   the   CPIO,  CBSE,   New   Delhi   to   seek   information   pertaining   to  subject   grades   awarded   to   his   daughter   Ms   Arushi  Kathpal   in   secondary   school   examination   (class   X)   -  enclosed herewith as Annexure A.

2. Vide   CPIO   order   dated   28   September   2010,  appellant was denied disclosure of information on the  grounds that owing to introduction of grading system  at Secondary Examination with effect from 2010 exam,  Board has discontinued with intimating of marks.

3. Appellant preferred appeal dated 13 October 2010  before the first appellate authority.

4. Matter   was   decided   vide   FAA   order   dated   16  November   2010   in   which   the   order   of   the   CPIO   was  upheld and appellant was informed that the Cumulative  Grade Point Average has already been provided in the  statement   of   Subject   Wise   Performance   along   with  formula  for calculating  the indicative   percentage  of  marks,     subject   wise   and   overall   have   also   been  provided   in   the   Statement   of   Subject   Wise  Performance. 

5. Being   aggrieved   and   not   being   satisfied   by   the  above   orders,   the   appellant   moved   the   Commission   in  second appeal. 

Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000415 2

6. Matter   was   heard   today.   Both   parties   were  present   as   above   in   person   and   made   submissions.  Respondent   submitted   that   it   would   be   contrary   to  government   policy   to   provide   specific   marks   awarded  for each subject and the government had, in an effort  to reform the existing system moved in favour of the  grading   system.   However   it   was   confirmed   by  respondent   that   the   marks   awarded   to   the   candidates  were available with them in their database. Appellant  stated   that   the   RTI   Act   could   not   be   overridden   by  government   policy   in   respect   of   order   of   grading  system   in   preference   to   awarding   subject   wise   marks  to students. Appellant, in response to query from the  Commission, stated that his daughter was currently a  student of class 12 and gave his consent in case the  Commission chose to speak with his daughter to obtain  her   submission   for     disclosure   of   information   that  was personal to her.

Decision notice

7. Accordingly,  recognizing the right of the child  to   exercise   her   right   to   providing   consent   /   denial  of   consent   for   disclosure   of   information   pertaining  to her performance in the examination for class X, I  have spoken to her after approaching the principal of  the   school   (as   per   the   provisions   of   section   11   of  the Act) and Ms Arushi Kathpal has given her consent  for   disclosure   of   information   as   requested   by   the  appellant   who   is   her   father.   While   Commission  recognizes   the   fact   that   the   Ministry   of   HRD   has  taken   certain   laudatory   steps   in   reforming   the  education   sector   for   the   benefit   of   students,   it  cannot   be   gainsaid   that   none   of   the   exemption  sections within the RTI Act are attracted to support  the   nondisclosure   of   the   information   sought   by   the  appellant.   Accordingly   CPIO,   CBSE   is   directed   to  provide   the   information   sought   by   the   appellant   to  him within two weeks of receipt of the order. 

 

(Smt. Deepak Sandhu) Information Commissioner (DS) Authenticated true copy:

(T. K. Mohapatra) Under Secretary & Dy. Registrar Tel. No. 011­26105027 Copy to:­ Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000415 3
1. Shri Anil Kumar Kathpal House No. 28/125, West Patel Nagar New Delhi­110008
2. The CPIO Dy.Secy.(Coord.) Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre Preet Vihar, Delhi­110301 
3. The Appellate Authority Controller of Examination    Central Board of Secondary Education Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre Preet Vihar, Delhi­110301         Appeal : No. CIC/DS/A/2011/000415