Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

G.Srinivasan vs The Managing Director on 16 July, 2019

Author: S.M.Subramaniam

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam

                                                          1

                                BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 16.07.2019

                                                       CORAM

                                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

                                             W.P(MD)No.2625 of 2014
                                                      and
                                              M.P(MD)No.1 of 2014


                 G.Srinivasan                                        ... Petitioner

                                                         Vs


                 The Managing Director,
                 Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited,
                 IV Floor, CMDA Tower II,
                 Gandhi Irvin Bridge Road,
                 Egmore,
                 Chennai-600 008.                                    ... Respondent


                 PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying
                 this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to entertain the
                 petitioner's application for the post of Assistant Manager and further direct him to
                 treat petitioner's educational qualification of Bachelor of Commerce (Computer
                 Application) as equivalent to Bachelor of Commerce in so far as the recruitment
                 process to the post of Assistant Manager is concerned.


                                     For Petitioner    : Mr.J.Pooventhera Rajan
                                     For Respondent : No appearance




http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                          2

                                                                              S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
                                                                                              am

                                                       ORDER

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner made a submission that after filing of the writ petition, the petitioner participated in the process of selection, however, he was not selected in the process and therefore, no further adjudication is required in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.





                 Index : Yes/No
                 Internet:Yes/No                                                   16.07.2019
                 am




                                                                           W.P(MD)No.2625 of 2014




http://www.judis.nic.in