Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 3]

Madras High Court

M/S. Yentop Manicakm Edible Oils (P) Ltd vs The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer-I on 9 December, 2015

Author: R.Mahadevan

Bench: R.Mahadevan

        

 
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated  :   09.12.2015

Coram

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.Mahadevan

W.P.Nos.5842 to 5844  of 2004
& W.P.M.P.Nos.6828, 6830 & 6832 of 2004


M/s. Yentop Manicakm Edible Oils (P) Ltd.,
Virudhanagar.		...Petitioner in W.P.No.5842/04

M/s.Ruby Vel Oil Traders
Virudhanagar.					... Petitioner in W.P.No.5843/04

M/s. Sree Nagalinga Vilas Oil Mills
Virudhanagar.					... Petitioner in W.P.No.5844/04


Versus


The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer-I,
Virudhanagar.
	....Respondents in both the W.Ps.


Prayer 	
         Writ Petitions, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution  of India, seeking for issuance of Writ of  Certiorari, to call for the impugned proceedings of the respondent herein in Assmt.Nos. 5721260, 5720960, 5720490/2002-2003  respectively on his file and quash the order dated 20.06.2003 therein in the light of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of M/s. India Carbon Industries reported in 106 STC 460.



	For Petitioners	 :  Mr. B.Raveendran

	For Respondent	 :  Mr.S.Kanmanni Annamalai, AGP




			COMMON     ORDER

These writ petitions have been filed seeking for a Certiorari to call for the impugned proceedings of the respondent herein in Assmt.Nos. 5721260, 5720960, 5720490/2002-2003 respectively on his file dated 20.06.2003 and to quash the same.

2. When these matters are taken up for hearing learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that during the relevant point of time there was no substantial provision for levy of interest for belated payment on Additional Sales Tax and the said issue is squarely covered by the decision rendered in 106 STC 460 [M/s. India Carbon Ltd., vs. State of Assam] followed by other decisions of this Court.

3. The said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not being disputed by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

4. Following the same, the impugned orders dated 20.06.2003 are liable to be quashed. Accordingly, the impugned order are set aside and these writ petitions are allowed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

09.12.2015 smi To The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer-I, Virudhanagar.

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

smi W.P.Nos.5842 to 5844 of 2004 09.12.2015