Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Sandeep Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 9 September, 2022

Bench: Vijay Bishnoi, Farjand Ali

     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               D.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 236/2022

Sandeep Singh S/o Sh. Dungar Singh, Aged About 45 Years, At
Present Lodged In Dist. Jail, Tonk Through His Wife Smt. Beby
Kanwar W/o Sh. Sandeep Singh, Age About 38 Years, R/o W.no.
8, Mantriyo Ke Kuye Ke Pas, P.s. Taranagar, Dist. Churu.
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.     State Of Rajasthan, Home Dept., Jaipur.
2.     The Director General (Jail), Jaipur.
3.     The Distrct Collector, Churu.
4.     The Dy. Superintendent, Dist. Jail, Tonk.
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Kalu Ram Bhati
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Anil Joshi, GA-cum-AAG assisted
                                by Mr. Pallav Sharma



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI Order 09/09/2022 The application filed by the convict-prisoner for sending him in the open air camp has been rejected by the concerned committee on the ground that he is convicted for the offence under Section 460 IPC and three other criminal cases are pending against him.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only two criminal cases were pending against the petitioner and in both the cases, he has acquitted. It is also submitted that out of the ten years of sentence for the offence under Section 460 IPC, the petitioner has already served out sentence of 9 years, 7 months (Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 09:39:33 PM) (2 of 2) [CRLW-236/2022] and 28 days till 05.07.2022. It is also submitted that there is no absolute bar in sending a prisoner to Open Air Camp where he or her is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 460 IPC.

Learned AAG has opposed the writ petition, however, he is not in a position to dispute the fact that in other two criminal cases, the petitioner has already been acquitted.

Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the petitioner has already been acquitted in other two criminal cases and he has served out sentence of around nine years and ten months, we deem it appropriate to direct the concerned committee to reconsider the case of the petitioner for sending him in open air camp.

It is expected that the concerned committee shall take the decision expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of passing of this order.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.

                                   (FARJAND ALI),J                                          (VIJAY BISHNOI),J
                                    49-mohit/-




                                                       (Downloaded on 09/09/2022 at 09:39:33 PM)




Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)