Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Suraj Precision Engineering ... vs The Chairman on 6 August, 2020

Author: P.D. Audikesavalu

Bench: P.D. Audikesavalu

                                                                                  W.P. No. 23873 of 2018

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                               DATED : 06.08.2020

                                                     CORAM

                            THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

                                              W.P. No. 23873 2018
                                                     and
                                            W.M.P. No. 27828 of 2018

                 M/s.Suraj Precision Engineering Workers Pvt Ltd.,
                 Flat No. 3-A/26/13, 3rd Floor,
                 AUM Apartments,
                 No.26, Kothari Road,
                 Nungambakkam,
                 Chennai – 600 034.                                                     ... Petitioner

                                                        -vs-

                 1. The Chairman,
                    Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council,
                    Chennai Region,
                    Commissioner and Director of Industries,
                      and Commerce,
                    Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

                 2. M/s. VNC Engineering,
                    No.4, Mariammam Koil Street,
                    Korattur,
                    Chennai – 600 080.                                              ... Respondents

                 Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
                 to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the First
                 Respondent pertaining to order dated 09.05.2018 made in proceeding O.P.No.
                 MSEFC/CR/45/2017 and quash the same and to direct the First Respondent to
                 1/5


http://www.judis.nic.in
                                                                                  W.P. No. 23873 of 2018

                 refer the claim dated 11.05.2017 to the claimant to arbitration in accordance with
                 the provisions of Section 18(3) of MSMED Act, 2006.


                               For Petitioner       :    Mr. R. Ravichandran

                               For Respondents :         Mr. D. Sathyaraj,
                                                         Special Government Pleader (for R1)

                                                         Mr. Ramesh Umapathy (for R2)


                                                       ORDER

(through video conference) The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order O.P. No. MSEFC/CR/45/2017 dated 09.05.2018 passed by the First Respondent and to direct the First Respondent to refer the claim dated 11.05.2017 of the claimant to arbitration in accordance with the provisions of Section 18(3) of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.

2. This Court on the request of the Learned Counsel for both sides, by an order dated 12.02.2020 had referred the matter to the Mediation Centre attached to this Court to amicable resolve the disputes between the parties through mediation. The report of outcome of mediation dated 09.03.2020 has been filed. In the joint compromise memo dated 09.03.2020 signed by the 2/5 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P. No. 23873 of 2018 Petitioner and the Second Respondent, that has been placed on record, sent along with that report, it has been stated as follows:-

“The above writ petition was referred to mediation and in the mediation parties to this joint compromise memo agreed to settle the issue amicably. As per the compromise arrived at between the parties the petitioner agreed to pay the fifty percent of the principal claim amount. Though the petitioner's defence is that the delivery challen produced by the 2nd respondent does not contain the required two seals to prove the delivery of goods, he has agreed to pay the fifty percent of the amount as gratitude payment taking note of the 2nd respondent's past service rendered to the petitioner. The 2nd respondent has received a Banker's Cheque bearing No. 093650 dated 05.03.2020 drawn at HDFC Bank, Nungambakkam, Chennai for a sum or Rs.1,95,539/- drawn in favour of the 2nd respondent and the 2nd respondent acknowledged the receipt of the same as full and final settlement.” It is confirmed by the Learned Counsel for both sides that the Second Respondent has received the aforesaid sum of Rs.1,95,539/- in full and final settlement of the claim made against the Petitioner. In view of the 3/5 http://www.judis.nic.in W.P. No. 23873 of 2018 subsequent events, nothing remains for further consideration in this Writ Petition.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.



                                                                                       06.08.2020
                                                                                           3/3
                 kv/vjt

                 Index     : Yes/No

Note: Issue order copy by 17.08.2020.

To The Chairman, Micro, Small, Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council, Chennai Region, Commissioner and Director of Industries, and Commerce, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

4/5

http://www.judis.nic.in W.P. No. 23873 of 2018 P.D. AUDIKESAVALU, J.

kv W.P. No. 23873 2018 06.08.2020 3/3 5/5 http://www.judis.nic.in