Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 1]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Harshit Foundation Sehlampur Jalalpur ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax Faizabad on 22 April, 2022

Bench: M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

                                                         1

     ITEM NO.30                                 COURT NO.12                  SECTION XI

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F         I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

             Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C)                 No(s).    26978/2017

     (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated passed by
     the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in ITA Defective No. 24
     of 2013)

     HARSHIT FOUNDATION SEHMALPUR JALALPUR JAUNPUR                           Petitioner(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX FAIZABAD                                     Respondent(s)

     Date : 22-04-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

     CORAM :                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
                            HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA

     For Petitioner(s)                   Mr.   Abhinav Mehrotra, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Kush Chaturvedi, AOR
                                         Ms.   Priyashree Sharma PH, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Syed Faraz Alam, Adv.

     For Respondent(s)                   Mr.   N.Venkataraman, ASG
                                         Ms.   Chinmayee Chandra, Adv.
                                         Ms.   Suhashini Sen, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Siddharth Kohli, Adv.
                                         Mr.   Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                O R D E R

We have heard Mr. Abhinav Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. N. Venkataraman, learned ASG appearing on behalf of the respondent.

The only question which is posed for consideration before the High Court was whether on non-deciding the application for registration Signature Not Verified under Section 12AA (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Digitally signed by R Natarajan Date: 2022.04.25 (for short ‘the Act’) within a period of six months, there shall be 17:14:49 IST Reason:

deemed registration or not.
The aforesaid aspect has been dealt with and considered in 2 detail by the Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court in its decision in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Muzafar Nagar Development Authority [ITA 348 of 2008]. After considering in detail the provisions of Section 12AA (2) of the Act and having found that there is no specific provision in the Act by which it provides that on non-deciding the registration application under Section 12AA (2) within a period of six months there shall be deemed registration, the Full Bench of the High Court has rightly held that even if in a case where the registration application under Section 12AA is not decided within six months, there shall not be any deemed registration. We are in complete agreement with the view taken by the Full Bench of the High Court.
The Special Leave Petition stands dismissed.
(R. NATARAJAN)                                               (NISHA TRIPATHI)
ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS                                        BRANCH OFFICER