Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

M/S.Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd vs Zee Laboratories Limited on 15 November, 2022

Author: M.Sundar

Bench: M.Sundar

                                                                        C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022

                                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                       Dated: 15.11.2022

                                                            CORAM

                                         THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR

                                             C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022
                                                            and
                                       O.A.Nos.469, 470 of 2022 & A.No.3350 of 2022
                                                             in
                                             C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022


                     M/s.Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.,
                     29, III Floor, SIDCO Garment Complex
                     Guindy, Chennai-600 032
                     Rep. by its Authorised Signatory
                     D.Jude F.L.S. Durai Pandian                                         .. Plaintiff

                                                               Vs.
                     Zee Laboratories Limited
                     Behind 47, Industrial Area,
                     Paonta Sahib - 173025, Himachal Pradesh
                     and their registered office at
                     913, D-Mall, Netaji Subash Place,
                     Pitampura, Delhi - 110 034.                                         .. Defendant

                                  This Civil Suit is preferred, under Order VII Rule 1 CPC and Order
                     IV Rule 1 OS Rules, read with Sections 27, 28, 29, 134 and 135 of the
                     Trademarks Act, 1999, praying
                                  (a) A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its
                     partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or
                     any one claiming through or under them from in any manner infringing

                     Page Nos.1/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022

                     the plaintiff's registered trademarks ZINCOVIT under No.487453 in
                     Class 5 and other registered trademarks by using a deceptively similar
                     trademark ZINCOWIT FORTE or any other trademark deceptively
                     similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark or in any other manner
                     whatsoever;
                                  (b) A permanent injunction restraining the defendant, by itself, its
                     partners, men, servants, agents, distributors, stockiest, representatives or
                     any one claiming through or under them from in any manner passing off
                     and / or enabling others to pass off the defendant's products under the
                     trademark ZINCOWIT FORTE as and for the plaintiffs' products by
                     manufacturing, selling, or offering to sell, distributing, displaying,
                     printing, stocking, using advertising their products with a trademark and
                     / or label or artistic work that is identical in colour scheme, get up and
                     layout with that of the plaintiff's ZINCOVIT trademark or artistic work or
                     in any other manner whatsoever;
                                  (c) The defendant be ordered to surrender to plaintiffs for
                     destruction of all products, labels, cartons, dyes, blocks, moulds, screen
                     prints, packing materials and other materials bearing the trademark
                     ZINCOWIT FORTE label or any mark deceptively similar to plaintiffs'
                     trademark and artistic work ZINCOVIT label;
                                  (d) A preliminary decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs
                     directing the defendant to render account of profits made by use of
                     trademark and copyright in the artistic work ZINCOWIT FORTE label
                     and a final decree be passed in favour of the plaintiffs for the amount of
                     profits thus found to have been made by the defendant after the latter


                     Page Nos.2/10
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
                                                                        C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022

                     have rendered accounts;
                                  (d) For costs of the suit;
                                        For Plaintiff          :   Mr.R.Sathish Kumar
                                        For Defendant          :   Mr.V.M.Venkatramana


                                                     JUDGMENT

This compromise judgment / decree and common order will now dispose of the captioned main suit and captioned three applications.

2. Captioned matter is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR REPORTING SETTLEMENT'.

3. Mr.R.Sathish Kumar, learned counsel on record for sole plaintiff company and Mr.V.M.Venkatramana, learned counsel on record for lone defendant are before this Commercial Division.

4. Both learned counsel submit that the plaintiff and defendant companies have since settled the lis and terms of settlement have been reduced to writing vide a 'Joint Memo of Compromise entered between the plaintiff and defendant dated 14.11.2022' [hereinafter 'said JMOC' for the sake of convenience and clarity]. The said JMOC duly signed by both parties and their respective counsel has been placed before this Commercial Division and a scanned reproduction of the same (together with docket) is as follows:

Page Nos.3/10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 Page Nos.4/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 Page Nos.5/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 Page Nos.6/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 Page Nos.7/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 Page Nos.8/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022

5. Adverting to aforementioned said JMOC, both learned counsel submit that the same was signed by both parties in the presence of one another and on this basis, both learned counsel request for dispensing with the presence of parties for recording said JMOC. It is also pointed out that Mr.D.Jude F.L.S Durai Pandian, Son of Durai Raj, aged 62 years, Authorized signatory and Chief Vigilance Officer of plaintiff company who has verified and signed pleadings (plaint) and Mr.Chander Shekhar, Son of Sh.Yash Pal, aged 58 years who has signed the Vakalatnama for defendant company have signed said JMOC. It is further submitted that both the natural persons have represented their respective companies i.e., juristic persons on the strength of Board Resolutions the same are subsisting and this is also another ground on which the prayer for dispensing with the presence of parties for recording said JMOC is made.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the trajectory the matter has taken and other attendant circumstances, this request is acceded to.

Page Nos.9/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 M.SUNDAR, J.

mk

7. Learned counsel on both sides request for disposal of captioned main suit by way of compromise decree in terms of said JMOC and consequent closure to the captioned applications. Request acceded to.

8. Captioned main suit is disposed of by way of joint compromise decree in terms of said JMOC which shall form part of judgment / decree. Consequently, captioned applications are disposed of as closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

15.11.2022 Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mk C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 and O.A.Nos.469, 470 of 2022 & A.No.3350 of 2022 in C.S.(Comm. Div.)No.155 of 2022 Page Nos.10/10 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis