Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Delhi High Court - Orders

Mr. Neeraj Aggarwal vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ... on 28 March, 2022

Author: Manmohan

Bench: Manmohan, Dinesh Kumar Sharma

                          $~8, 32, 38, 40, 55, 68 & 92
                          *     IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
                          8
                          +     W.P.(C) 4808/2022
                                MR. NEERAJ AGGARWAL                             ..... Petitioner
                                                 Through       Mr. S. Krishnan, Advocate.

                                                   versus

                                THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
                                                                          ..... Respondents
                                              Through Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.

                          32
                          +     W.P.(C) 5018/2022
                                BALDEV KRISHNA SHARMA                     ..... Petitioner
                                                 Through Ms. Smriti Sahay, Mr. Alok Kumar
                                                         and Mr. M. Goswami, Advocates.
                                                 versus

                                UNION OF INDIA & ORS.                         ..... Respondents
                                              Through       Mr. Krishna Kumar Sharma, Sr. Panel
                                                            Advocate for R-1/UOI.
                                                            Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Sr.
                                                            Standing counsel with Mr. Tushar
                                                            Gupta and Mr.Samarth Chaudhari,
                                                            Advocates.
                          38
                          +     W.P.(C) 5024/2022
                                UMA SHANKER                                    ..... Petitioner
                                                 Through    Mr. Piyush Kaushik, Advocate

                                                   versus

                                PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -20 NEW
                                DELHI & ANR.                            ..... Respondents
                                             Through  Mr. Ajit Sharma, Advocate.



Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KRISHNA BHOJ
Signing Date:29.03.2022
17:16:30
                           40
                          +    W.P.(C) 5027/2022
                               RENU MITTAL                                    ..... Petitioner
                                                Through   Ms. Vatsala Chandra Chaturvedi and
                                                          Ms. Sheetal Kandpal, Advocates.
                                               versus

                               ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 58(1)
                               DELHI AND ANR.                           ..... Respondents
                                            Through Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.

                          55
                          +    W.P.(C) 5064/2022
                               NITIN SAXENA                                  ..... Petitioner
                                               Through    Mr. Salil Kapoor, Mr. Sanat Kapoor,
                                                          Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Mr.Sumit
                                                          Lalchandani, Ms. Soumya Singh and
                                                          Mr.Tarun Chanana, Advocates.
                                               versus

                               ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 49-1
                               & ANR.                                ..... Respondents
                                            Through Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Advocate.

                          68
                          +    W.P.(C) 5083/2022
                               SOCIETY FOR EXCELLENCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION
                                                                      ..... Petitioner
                                             Through Mr. Ved Kumar Jain, Advocate.
                                             versus

                               DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE EXEMP
                               2-1, DELHI & ORS.                       ..... Respondents
                                              Through Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Advocate.




Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed
By:KRISHNA BHOJ
Signing Date:29.03.2022
17:16:30
                           92
                          +     W.P.(C) 5119/2022
                                SUN PARKS PRIVATE LIMITED                            ..... Petitioner
                                                    Through      Mr. Saurabh Dev Karan Singh and
                                                                 Ms. Kanika Jain, Advocates.
                                                    versus

                                ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE (22)
                                2, DELHI                                 ..... Respondent
                                             Through Mr. Puneet Rai, Sr. Standing counsel

                                CORAM:
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
                                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
                                        ORDER

% 28.03.2022 CM APPL. 14373/2022 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 4808/2022 CM APPL. 14954/2022 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 5018/2022 CM APPL. 15047/2022 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 5064/2022 CM APPL. 15179/2022 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 5119/2022 CM APPL. 15104/2022 (exemption) in W.P.(C) 5083/2022 Exemptions allowed subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 4808/2022 & CM APPL. 14373/2022 (Stay) W.P.(C) 5018/2022 & CM APPL. 14953/2022 (Stay) W.P.(C) 5024/2022 & CM APPL. 14974/2022 (stay) W.P.(C) 5027/2022 & CM APPL. 14976/2022 (stay) W.P.(C) 5064/2022 & CM APPL. 15046/2022 (stay) W.P.(C) 5119/2022 & CM APPL. 15178/2022 (stay) W.P.(C) 5083/2022 & CM APPL.15103/2022 (interim relief) By way of the present batch of petitions, this Court has been called upon to decide the validity of E-notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The petitioners have classified the matters in the following categories:

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:29.03.2022 17:16:30
1. Category A: is in respect of writ petitions where Notice is dated 31st March, 2021 or before but digitally signed on or after 1st April, 2021, however sent and received on or after 1st April, 2021.
2. Category B: is in respect of writ petitions where Notice is dated 31st March, 2021 or before digitally not signed, however sent and received on or after 1st April, 2021.
3. Category C: is in respect of writ petitions where Notice is dated 31st March, 2021 or before digitally signed on or before 31st March, 2021, however sent and received on or after 1st April, 2021.
4. Category D: is in respect of writ petitions where Notice is dated 31st March, 2021 or before digitally signed on or before 31st March, 2021, no service either by e-mail or by post or any other mode and assessee came to know later on through Portal or receipt of subsequent notice under Section 142(1).
5. Category E: is in respect of writ petitions where Notice is dated 31st March, 2021 or before manually signed, no service by e-mail but dispatched through speed post on or after 1st April, 2021.

It is pertinent to mention that the Allahabad High Court in Daujee Abhushan Bhandar Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India and 2 Others, Writ Tax No.78/2022 has held as under:-

" xxx xxx xxx

29. ...........Section 13(1) of the Act, 2000 provides that unless otherwise agreed, the dispatch of an electronic record occurs when it enters into computer resources outside the control of the originator. Thus, the point of time when a digitally signed notice in the form of electronic record is entered in computer resources Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:29.03.2022 17:16:30 outside the control of the originator i.e. the assessing authority that shall the date and time of issuance of notice under section 148 read with Section 149 of the Act, 1961.

30. In view of the discussion made above, we hold that mere digitally signing the notice is not the issuance of notice. Since the impugned notice under Section 148 of the Act, 1961 was issued to the petitioner on 06.04.2021 though e-mail, therefore, we hold that the impugned notice under section 148 of the Act, 1961 is time barred. Consequently, the impugned notice is quashed. ..........."

Keeping in view the aforesaid judgment, this Court is of the view that the present batch of matters requires detailed examination.

Issue notice. Mr. Sunil Kumar Agarwal, Mr. Ajit Sharma, Ms. Vibhooti Malhotra, Mr. Abhishek Maratha and Mr. Puneet Rai, Advocates accept notice on behalf of respondents.

As the deadline for passing the assessment order is 31st March, 2022, this Court is of the view that it would not be possible to pass a judgment prior thereto. Accordingly, proceedings pursuant to the impugned reassessment notices are stayed till further orders.

Parties are given liberty to complete the pleadings before the next date of hearing.

List on 11th April, 2022.

MANMOHAN, J DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J MARCH 28, 2022 Pallavi Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KRISHNA BHOJ Signing Date:29.03.2022 17:16:30