Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

R. Mohammed Rafi vs The State Of Karnataka on 21 January, 2022

Author: R Devdas

Bench: R Devdas

                             -1-


     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

       DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2022

                        BEFORE

           THE HON' BLE MR.JUSTICE R DEVDAS

      WRIT PETITION NO.1122 OF 2022 (CS-EL/M)

BETWEEN

1.    R. MOHAMMED RAFI
      S/O. H. ABDUL RAHEEM SAAB,
      AGED 51 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 4744.

2.    SIDDARAMANNA C
      S/O. ALURU SIDDAIAH
      AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 2388.

3.    SAROJAMMA B V
      W/O. SIDDARAMANNA
      AGED 69 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 2377.

4.    SARMAS ALI
      S/O. MUJEEB ULLA
      AGED 40 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 7132.

5.    P S SADATHULLA
      S/O. P M SAMIULLA
      AGED 52 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 3792.
                              -2-


6.    SHANKARAPPA
      S/O. SANNAHANUMANTHAPPA
      AGED 51 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO7306.

7.    G A NAZAR
      S/O. B S BUDEN SAAAB
      AGED 60 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 7245.

8.    SHABANA
      W/O. MOHAMMED RAFI
      AGED 40 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 6275.

9.    G PANDURANGAPPA
      S/O. GIRIYAPPA
      AGED 50 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 6662.

10.   K C MANJULADEVI
      W/O. G PANDURANGAPPA
      AGED 45 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 6663.

11.   UNUS SAAB
      S/O. HASMATH SAAB
      AGED 42 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 7205.

12.   T R GOPAL
      S/O. THIMMAJJA
      AGED 70 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 8019.

13.   V H RAJU
      S/O. VENKATAPPA
      AGED 68 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 2103.
                              -3-


14.   G PREM KUMAR
      S/O. B GOPAIAH
      AGED 35 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 4964.

15.   IMTIYAZ
      S/O. H RAHIM SAAB
      AGED 38 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 6941.

16.   K SATHYANARAYANACHAR
      S/O. LATE. KRISHNA
      AGED 50 YEARS
      MEMBERSHIP NO. 5292
                                         ... PETITIONERS

      ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE MEMBERS
      OF THE HIRIYURU URBAN CO-OPERATIVE
      BANK LTD., MAIN ROAD, HIRIYURU
      CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577598

(BY SRI. DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

AND

1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
      DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION
      M S BUILDING,
      DR. B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
      BENGALURU 560001
      REPRESENTED BY ITS
      PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

2.    THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE
      ELECTION AUTHORITY
      3RD FLOOR, TTMC, A-BLOCK,
      SHANTHI NAGAR,
      BANGALORE 560027
                            -4-


     REPRESENTED BY
     ITS SECRETARY

3.   DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO OPERATIVE
     SOCIETIES / DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER
     BL GOWDA LAYOUT, RTO ROAD,
     CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577501

4.   THE HIRIYUR URBAN CO OPERATIVE
     BANK LTD,
     MAIN ROAD, HIRIYUR,
     CHITRADURGA DISTRICT- 577598
     REPRESENTED BY
     ITS GENERAL MANAGER
                                        ... RESPONDENTS

     (BY SRI. R SRINIVASA GOWDA, AGA)


     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
RESPONDENTS NO.2, 3, 4, AND 5 TO INCLUDE THE NAMES OF
THE PETITIONERS IN THE ELIGIBLE LIST OF VOTERS LIST AND
PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO PARTICIPATE, CONTEST AND
VOTE IN THE ELECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENT NO.5 WHICH IS
SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 30.01.2022 IN THE INTEREST OF
JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

     THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                               -5-


                            ORDER

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

The petitioners herein have filed this writ petition being aggrieved of their disqualification to participate in the elections either as contesting candidates or to cast their votes, in terms of the provisions of Section 20(2) (a)(iv) &
(v) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

2. Recently, this Court had an occasion to consider similar prayers made in W.P.No.24223/2021. This Court by order dated 10.01.2022, took note of the fact that in W.P.No.48973/2019 and connected matters in the case of Sri Venkategowda and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others, dated 04.08.2021, wherein the vires of the said provisions were questioned and this Court has upheld the validity of the said provisions.

3. However, since the action by the authorities for disqualifying the members was in accordance with Section -6- 20 of the Act and the provision having been upheld, the prayer made in those writ petitions were rejected.

4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE DL