Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 11, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Assistant Collector Custms And Central ... vs Bhagat Ram on 13 January, 2010

Author: A.N.Jindal

Bench: A.N.Jindal

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                     AT CHANDIGARH

                         Criminal Appeal No.435-SBA of 1998
                         Date of Decision 13.01.2010

Assistant Collector Custms and Central Excise Division, Pathankot, District
Gurdaspur.
                                                ...... Appellant(s)

                         VERSUS

Bhagat Ram
                                                   ...... Respondent(s)

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL

Present:     Mr.D.D.Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant.

                         *****

A.N.JINDAL, J(ORAL):

This is an appeal against the judgment dated 12.09.1997, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gurdaspur, acquitting the accused respondent Bhagat Ram in complaint case No.110/1 of 1991 under Sections 8(1), 27, 55 & 85/86 of Gold Control Act of 1968 read with Section 11 and 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, Section 3 (1) of the Imports/Exports Control Act, 1947 and Section 13 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.

Arguments heard. Record perused. Evidence appears to have been appreciated in the right perspective. The expert, who examined the gold biscuits allegedly recovered from the accused-respondent, has not been examined, therefore, his report is not per-se admissible under Section 293 Cr.P.C. Therefore, in the absence of the report, it could not be said that contraband recovered from the respondents was actually smuggled. Resultantly, finding no merit in the present appeal, the same is dismissed.

(A.N.Jindal) Judge 13.01.2010 mamta-II