Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court - Daily Orders

Peer Gulam Jilani vs Peer Gulam Naseer on 2 September, 2015

     ITEM NO.85                            REGISTRAR COURT. 1               SECTION XV

                                   S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
                                           RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
                                   BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA

     Civil Appeal                 No(s).    10770-10772/2013

     PEER GULAM JILANI                                                    Appellant(s)

                                                        VERSUS

     PEER GULAM NASEER & ORS.                                             Respondent(s)
     (with office report)

     Date : 02/09/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

     For Appellant(s)
                                           Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv.
                                           Mr. Prashant Chaudhary,Adv.

     For Respondent(s)
                                           Mr.   Aftab Ali Khan,Adv.
                                           Mr.   Alok Shukla,Adv.
                                           Mr.   Shiva Pujan Singh,Adv.
                                           Mr.   T. Gopal, Adv.
                                           Ms.   Aishwarya Bhati,Adv.
                                           Ms.   Sangeeta Singh, Adv.
                                           Ms.   Niranjana Singh,Adv.

                             UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
                                                 O R D E R

Service qua all the 17 respondents in C.A. No.10770/2013, 10 respondents in C.A. No.10771/2013 and 6 respondents in C.A. No.10772/2013 is complete.

None of the parties have filed the statement of case. Since it is no more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court Rules, 2013 and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumed to have been accepted by the parties.

The appeals stand complete, in the given circumstances. Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Rupam Dhamija Date: 2015.09.07 17:20:40 IST Reason:

(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar