Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Om Parkash vs Subhash Chand And Anr on 20 March, 2019

Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

Bench: Tarlok Singh Chauhan

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA

                                RSA No. 4380/2013 along with CWP
                                No. 17/2009
                                Decided on: 20.3.2019




                                                                                      .
    _______________________________________________________________





    RSA No. 4380/2013

    Om Parkash                                                                           .....Appellant





                                          Versus

    Subhash Chand and anr.                                                         ....Respondents

    CWP No. 17/2009

    Om Parkash
                                 r        Versus

    The Financial Commissioner (Appeals) and anr. ....Respondents
                                                                                          .....Petitioner

    Coram:
    The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.



    Whether approved for reporting?1 No

    For the appellants/                           Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Advocate,for




    petitioners:                                  the appellant in RSA No. 4380/2013
                                                  and for the petitioner in CWP No.





                                                  17/2009.

    For the respondents:                          Mr. K. D. Sood, Senior Advocate





                                                  with Mr. Shubham Sood, Advocate,
                                                  for respondent No.1 in RSA No.
                                                  4380/2013 and for respondent No.2
                                                  in CWP No. 17/2009.

                                Mr. Vinod Thakur and Mr. Sudhir
                                Bhatnagar, Addl. A.Gs. with Mr.
                                Bhupinder Thkaur and Ms. Svaneel
                                Jaswal, Dy.A.Gs. for respondent
                                No.1 in CWP No. 17/2009
    __________________________________________________________

    1
        Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.




                                                                  ::: Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 22:00:07 :::HCHP
                Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)

.

RSA No. 4380/2013

It is jointly represented by the learned counsel for the parties that the appeal be disposed of in terms of the Local Commissioner's reports dated 12.12.2018 and 12.3.2019 coupled with statements recorded and site plans appended along with the reports and the same be made part and parcel of the decree.

2 Accordingly, the impugned judgments and decrees passed by both the leaned courts below are modified to the extent that the parties shall be bound by the Local Commissioner's reports dated 12.12.2018 and 12.3.2019 coupled with statements recorded and site plans appended along with the reports, which are made part and parcel of the decree.

3 The appeal stands disposed of, in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending application(s), if any. The parties are left to bear their own costs.

::: Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 22:00:07 :::HCHP CWP No. 17/2009

.

4 In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties in RSA No. 4380/2013, nothing survives in this writ petition and the same is accordingly disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. The parties are left to bear their own costs.

(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge 20.3.2019 (pankaj) ::: Downloaded on - 22/03/2019 22:00:07 :::HCHP