Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Bombay High Court

Ganesh Balchandra Mali vs The State Of Maharashtra on 5 February, 2020

Author: Prakash D. Naik

Bench: Prakash D. Naik

R.V.Patil                                   1                                910-ABA-302-2020


          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

        ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.302 OF 2020

Ganesh Balchandra Mali                                    ....Applicant
            V/s.
The State of Maharashtra                                  ....Respondent

Mr. A. P. Mundargi senior Advocate, i/b. Kuldeep S. Patil, for the
Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Pednekar, APP for the Respondent- State.
PI, S. S. Patil, Navghar Police Station, present.

                                    CORAM       : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

                                    DATE        : 05th February, 2020

P.C.:


1.      This is an application for Anticipatory Bail in connection with

C.R.No. I-13 of 2020, registered with Mira Road Police Station,

District- Thane Rural, for offences punishable under Sections 376,

377, 323, 506 (II), 506, 504 r/w 34 of Indian Penal Code ("IPC" for

short).


2.      The First Information Report ("FIR" for short) was lodged on

12th January 2020. The applicant preferred an application for the

Anticipatory Bail before the Sessions Court. The said application is

rejected on 24th January 2020. During pendency of that application

interim protection was granted to the applicant by order dated 16 th




     ::: Uploaded on - 11/02/2020                        ::: Downloaded on - 07/06/2020 16:15:33 :::
 R.V.Patil                              2                              910-ABA-302-2020


January 2020.            While granting interim protection, the Court had

recorded the submissions on behalf of the applicant. Considered

rulings cited and ratio of the cases and granted interim protection,

on condition that applicant shall attend concern Police Station on

every Sunday between 10 a.m to 11 a.m till decision of main

application. It is submitted that, the applicant has complied the said

condition. Subsequently, the application was rejected.


3.     The case of the complainant is that, she is actress by

profession. The applicant is Police Officer. She had visited Police

Station to lodge complaint in June 2016.                The applicant had

interaction with her and took her phone number. In June 2016, the

applicant and the complainant were acquainted with each other.

They developed friendship. They met frequently. They went out

together on several occasions. The accused promised her that he

would marry her. In April 2019, the accused had physical

relationship with complainant. They went to Satava and stayed in

hotel. The accused had forcible relationship. He avoided topic of

marriage. Several other allegations are made in FIR.


4.     The applicant's contention is that, the complaint is false. The

complainant is major lady. As per complaint, both knew each other

since 2016 and were allegedly intimate since April 2019. The wife of




     ::: Uploaded on - 11/02/2020                 ::: Downloaded on - 07/06/2020 16:15:33 :::
 R.V.Patil                                    3                              910-ABA-302-2020


the applicant had filed a complaint against the complainant for the

offence under Section 384 of IPC.                    Whatsapp messages were

exchanged           between          both,   which   shows      relationship          was

consensual. The complainant had lodged FIR against Mahaveer

Chauhan with Kashimira Police Station, under Sections 376 and 325

of IPC. She was aware that the applicant is married person. It is

contended that, the station diary entries which were obtained

through RTI indicates that, the complainant had visited Police

Station on several occasions but did not lodge complaint.

Subsequently the present FIR was registered. The applicant and

his wife are implicated in this case.


5.      Learned APP submitted that, the applicant made false promise

of marriage. Under pretext of promises, he had physical relationship

with victim. Investigation is transferred to Navghar Police Station.


6.      I have perused FIR. Considered submissions of both sides.

Considering the facts of this case interim protection can be granted

to the applicant.

                                         ORDER

(i) In the event of the arrest of the applicant in connection with C.R.No. I-13 of 2020 registered with Mira Road Police Station, ::: Uploaded on - 11/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 07/06/2020 16:15:33 ::: R.V.Patil 4 910-ABA-302-2020 District- Thane Rural, the Applicant be released on bail on his executing P.R bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties in the like amount;

(ii) The applicant shall report to the investigating officer attached to Navghar Police Station, on 10 th, 11th and 12th of February 2020, between 11:00 a.m. to 01:00 p.m;

(iii) Stand Over to 05th March 2020. To be listed on "Supplementary Board".

( PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) ::: Uploaded on - 11/02/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 07/06/2020 16:15:33 :::