Jharkhand High Court
Balram Tudu vs The State Of Jharkhand And Anr on 19 July, 2017
Author: Anant Bijay Singh
Bench: Anant Bijay Singh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B. A. No. 2867 of 2016
Balram Tudu ...... Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Jharkhand
2. Bhuli Kumari ...... Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
For the Petitioner :Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate
For the State :A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. N.P. Thakur, Advocate
05/Dated: 19/07/2017
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with C.P. Case No. 2545 of 2015
for the offence under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.
It appears that under order dated 27.02.2017, the petitioner was directed to pay Rs.
3,000/ per month from the month of January, 2017 to the O.P. No. 2 and further arrear
amount of Rs. 9,000/ for the month of January to March, 2017 and further 9,000/ for the
month for the month of April, 2017 to June, 2017 latest by 20.06.2017.
Today, parties are physically present along with learned counsels. O.P. No. 2 has stated
that she has received the aforesaid amount.
Today, learned counsels for the parties produced a copy of mediation report dated
04.07.2017of the Mediation Centre, Dhanbad. From its perusal it appears that the matter has been settled between the parties. Both the parties identified their signatures on the mediation report. According to terms and condition, the petitioner has to pay Rs. 3,500/ to the O.P. NO. 2 per month. The terms and condition arrived in the agreement is incorporated as a part of bail order.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from the date of this order and in the event of his arrest or surrender the Court below shall enlarge the above named petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/ (Rupees ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of S.D.J.M, Dhanbad in connection with C.P. Case No. 2545 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and also subject to the conditions that if the petitioner violates the terms and conditions imposed by the Mediator, and if the petitioner does not pay the aforesaid amount in two consecutive dates to the O.P. No. 2, the opposite party no. 2 will be at liberty to file application for cancellation of anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.) Satyarthi/