Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Karnataka High Court

Ishwarappa Ingalahalli vs The State Of Karnataka on 22 January, 2026

Author: V.Srishananda

Bench: V.Srishananda

                                                    -1-
                                                                NC: 2026:KHC-D:830
                                                         CRL.P No. 104105 of 2025
                                                     C/W CRL.P No. 104103 of 2025

                      HC-KAR



                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD

                           DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2026

                                            BEFORE

                           THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA

                             CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104105 OF 2025

                                    (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS))
                                              C/W
                             CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 104103 OF 2025



                      IN CRL.P.NO.104105/2025
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   ISHWARAPPA INGALAHALLI
                           AGE MAJOR, OCC. PROPRIETOR,
                           SHRI BASAWESHWAR KRUSHI KENDRA,
                           T.A.P.M.C. SOCIETY, NEAR BUS STAND, KUNDGOL,
                           TQ. KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-581001.

                      2.   T. BALCHANDRA
                           AGE MAJOR, OCC, MARKETING OFFICER,
                           SPIC GREEN STAR FERTILISERS LTD.,
Digitally signed by
                           SPEAKER NAGAR, MUTHIYAMPURAM POST,
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN
KATTIMANI
                           TAMIL NADU.
Location: High
Court of
                                                                      ...PETITIONERS
Karnataka,
Dharwad Bench.        (BY SRI. M.L. VANTI, ADVOCATE FOR
                      SRI. V.M. SHEELVANT, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                      FERTILIZER INSPECTOR CUM
                      ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, KUNDGOL,
                      R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
                      HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                      DHARWAD BENCH-580001.
                                                                      ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R.PATIL, HCGP)
                               -2-
                                          NC: 2026:KHC-D:830
                                   CRL.P No. 104105 of 2025
                               C/W CRL.P No. 104103 of 2025

HC-KAR



      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. AND
U/S. 528 OF BNSS 2023, PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IN C.C.
NO.1375/2024 REGISTERED FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER 19(A)
(B) OF FERTILIZER CONTROL ORDER, 1985 AND SECTION 7 OF
ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1955 PENDING ON THE FILE OF
SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDGOL, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.

IN CRL.P.104103/2025
BETWEEN:

1.   MALLIKARJUN S. KARIGAR
     AGE MAJOR OCC. SECRETORY RAITA
     BELE RAKSHAKA SANGHA, GUDAGERI,
     TQ. KUNDGOL, DIST. DHARWAD-580001.

2.   T. BALCHANDRA
     AGE MAJOR, OCC. MARKETING OFFICER,
     SPIC GREEN STAR FERTILISERS LTD.,
     14TH CROSS, JAYANAGAR, 2ND BLOCK,
     BANGALURU-560001.
                                                ...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. M.L. VANTI, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. V.M. SHEELVANT, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
FERTILIZER INSPECTOR CUM
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE KUNDGOL,
R/BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH-580011.
                                                ...RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP)

      THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. AND
U/S. 528 OF BNSS 2023, PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THE PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 AND 2 IN C.C.
NO.541/2025 REGISTERED FOR OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER
SECTION 7(1)(A) (2) OF THE ESSENTIAL COMMODITIES ACT, 1955
PENDING ON THE FILE OF SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDGOL, IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
                                    -3-
                                                   NC: 2026:KHC-D:830
                                        CRL.P No. 104105 of 2025
                                    C/W CRL.P No. 104103 of 2025

 HC-KAR



    THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

                              ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Heard Sri M.L.Vanti for Sri V.M.Sheelvant, learned counsel for petitioners and Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent.

2. These two petitions are filed by the accused challenging the order taking cognizance and proceeding with the criminal case in respect of the offences alleged against the petitioners under Section 19(A)(B) of Fertilizer Control Order, 1985 and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

3. Petitioners in both the cases would contend that they are only employee and retail seller of the alleged substandard fertilizer.

4. He would further contend that in the absence of arraigning the company/manufacturer as accused, criminal prosecution only against the employer or the retail seller is impermissible.

-4-

NC: 2026:KHC-D:830 CRL.P No. 104105 of 2025 C/W CRL.P No. 104103 of 2025 HC-KAR

5. In that regard, he places reliance on the order passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.101933/2022 dated 20.07.2022 and Criminal Petition No.100487/2023 dated 05.06.2023.

6. Per contra, Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil, learned High Court Government Pleader would contend that petitioners are also liable for the offences irrespective of the fact that the manufacturers/company is not arraigned as a party accused.

7. The Court having heard the arguments of both sides noted that under Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1968, unless the company is arraigned as a party in a criminal prosecution, no action can be taken for the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act when the petitioners are employee of the fertilizer manufacturing company and retail seller. It cannot be presumed that they had the knowledge that seized material is substandard fertilizer.

8. Accordingly, criminal prosecution against the petitioners needs to be quashed.

9. Hence, following order is passed.

                               -5-
                                               NC: 2026:KHC-D:830
                                   CRL.P No. 104105 of 2025
                               C/W CRL.P No. 104103 of 2025

HC-KAR




                            ORDER

     i.    Both petitions are allowed.

ii. Pending proceedings in C.C.No.1375/2024 and C.C.No.541/2025 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and J.M.F.C., Kundgol are hereby quashed.

Sd/-

(V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE CLK Ct-cmu LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 62