Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 1]

Central Information Commission

Mr.Dilip Kumar Chavanni vs Prime Minister Office on 23 July, 2012

                       Central Information Commission, New Delhi
                             File No.CIC/SM/A/2011/002139
                  Right to Information Act­2005­Under Section  (19)




Date of hearing                       :                                     23 July 2012


Date of decision                      :                                     23 July 2012



Name of the Appellant                 :   Shri Dalip Kumar Chawani,
                                          Lt. Vivek Sajwan Marg,
                                          Sewa Nagar Chowk,
                                          New Delhi - 110 003.


Name of the Public Authority          :   CPIO, Prime Minister's Office,
                                          South Block,
                                          New Delhi - 110 101.



        The Appellant was present in person.

        On behalf of the Respondent, the following were present:­
        (i)      Smt. Sanjukta Ray, Director,
        (ii)     Shri Sanjeev Gupta, CAPIO,
        (iii)    Shri Subhendu Hota, CAPIO



Chief Information Commissioner                 :      Shri Satyananda Mishra



Both   the   parties   are   present   during   the   hearing   and   made   their  submissions.

2. The  Appellant  had  written  to   the  Prime  Minister  of  India  complaining  against the misuse of the National Emblem by a certain publisher in the edition  CIC/SM/A/2011/002139 of the Indian Constitution published by them. The CPIO had informed him that  his letter had been forwarded to the Home Ministry (MHA) for further necessary  action. His RTI application was consequently transferred to that Ministry. The  MHA wrote to the Appellant and informed him that they had taken up the matter  with   the   publisher   concerned   which   informed   them   that   they   had   since  discontinued printing the National Emblem on the front page of the edition of  the  Indian  Constitution. The CPIO  of  the  MHA had  enclosed  a copy  of the  communication received from the publishers.

3. We   have   carefully   considered   the   RTI   request   and   the   information  provided.   Since   the   entire   information   sought   has   been   provided,   there   is  nothing more to be done in this case. However, if the Appellant thinks that the  misuse of the National Emblem still continues, he can take up the matter in any  competent court.

4. Hence, the appeal is disposed off accordingly.

5. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

(Satyananda Mishra) Chief Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against  application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this  Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla) Deputy Registrar CIC/SM/A/2011/002139