Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 3, Cited by 2]

Supreme Court of India

State Of Kerala vs T.S. Govindarajulu Naidu on 31 March, 1993

Equivalent citations: 1993(2)KLT129(SC), 1993SUPP(3)SCC656, [1993]90STC35(SC), AIRONLINE 1993 SC 83, (1993) 2 KER LT 129, (1991) 2 MAD LW 599, 1993 SCC (SUPP) 3 656, (2001) 10 JT 167 (SC), 2002 (10) SCC 156, (2002) 1 ALL WC 136, (2002) 2 CURCC 221, (2002) 2 LANDLR 678, (2002) 46 ALL LR 733, (2002) 4 SUPREME 463, (2006) 4 ALLMR 640, (2006) 5 BOM CR 383

Bench: Kuldip Singh, Yogeshwar Dayal

ORDER

1. The respondent was a dealer in synthetic gems. He purchased the gems in the State of Kerala and sold the same in Tiruchy and other places outside the State. The question before the High Court was whether for the purchases and sales made by the respondent-assessee, was he liable to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963? Relying upon the exemption notification issued under Section 10 of the Act the High Court came to the conclusion that the synthetic gems were exempt from the payment of tax under the Act. This is the State appeal against the judgment of the High Court.

2. We have heard learned Counsel for the appellant. He has taken us through the judgment of the High Court which is - T.S. Govindarajulu Naidu v. State of Kerala). We agree with the reasoning and the Conclusion reached therein. We see no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High Court. The appeal is dismissed. No costs.