Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 0, Cited by 2]

Himachal Pradesh High Court

Kra Basile vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 14 October, 2019

Author: Chander Bhusan Barowalia

Bench: Chander Bhusan Barowalia

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
                                          Cr. MP (M) No. 1827 of 2019
                                       Decided on: October 14, 2019
            ______________________________________________________________




                                                                                     .

            Kra Basile
                                                                           ....Petitioner
                                   Versus
            State of Himachal Pradesh





                                                                               ...Respondent
        _




        Coram
        The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge.





        Whether approved for reporting?1 No.
        For the petitioner              :           Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Mr.
                                                    Prashant Sharma and Mr. Ajit
                                                    Sharma, Advocates.

        For the respondent              :           Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans and Mr.

                                                    P.K. Bhatti,, Addl. AGs with Mr.
                                                    Raju Ram Rahi and Mr. Gaurav
                                                    Sharma, Dy. AGs.

                                                    S.I. Surjeet Singh, P.S. Dhalli,



                                                    District Shimla, H.P.


        Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)

When the matter was taken up today, it is stated that seven prosecution witnesses have already been examined, whereas ten witnesses are yet to be examined and the case is now listed for recording the statements of prosecution witnesses on 21st October, 2019. On this, learned counsel for the petitioner states at this stage, he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file the same afresh, as and when required, however, he states that as the petitioner is behind the Bars from last one year 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.

::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2019 20:24:02 :::HCHP 2

and four months, learned trial Court may be requested to expedite the trial of the present case and decide the case .

before 31st December, 2019.

2. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed, as withdrawn, with liberty, as prayed for. However, taking into consideration the recovered contraband and the fact that the petitioner is behind the Bars from last one year and four month, it is expected that learned trial Court will try to dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible and preferably within four months from today. The petition so also, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of.



                                     (Chander Bhusan Barowalia)
    October 14, 2019                           Judge
             (raman)







                                             ::: Downloaded on - 14/10/2019 20:24:02 :::HCHP